CAJ | 학술논문

由于游戏本身的复杂性和研究者不同的学术背景、观察角度、方法论等问题,迄今为止,人们对于游戏的看法并没有形成统一的认识。试从理论基础、儿童游戏观、游戏课程设置、游戏式教学法及游戏设备五个方面比较陈鹤琴和蒙台梭利两位教育家的游戏理论,其目的在于从理论上开拓视野,同时,也是对当下学前教育界引进外国教育模式过热,而对传统教育文化存在一定程度漠视的反思。
유우유희본신적복잡성화연구자불동적학술배경、관찰각도、방법론등문제,흘금위지,인문대우유희적간법병몰유형성통일적인식。시종이론기출、인동유희관、유희과정설치、유희식교학법급유희설비오개방면비교진학금화몽태사리량위교육가적유희이론,기목적재우종이론상개탁시야,동시,야시대당하학전교육계인진외국교육모식과열,이대전통교육문화존재일정정도막시적반사。
Due to the complexity of the game itself and the different academic cultural background and different methodology applied,people have not formed the agreed points of view on game.The paper compared the game theory of two educationists-Chen Heqin and Montessori from the aspects of theoretical bases,view of child game,the setting of game course,the teaching methodology and the device for game.The aim is to broaden the theoretical horizon.And at the same time,it is the reflection on the situation that many foreign educational model have been introduced into China,ignoring the value of traditional educational ideas to some extent.