中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志
中華航海醫學與高氣壓醫學雜誌
중화항해의학여고기압의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NAUTICAL MEDICINE AND HYPERBARIC MEDICINE
2009年
2期
114-116
,共3页
海勤人员%战伤救护%知识培训%调查
海勤人員%戰傷救護%知識培訓%調查
해근인원%전상구호%지식배훈%조사
Shipboard naval personnel%Combat casualty care%Care training%Questionnaire
目的 了解海勤人员战伤救护知识培训现状,为进一步系统有效地开展培训提供依据.方法 根据海勤人员的工作环境、战备训练及现代海战伤救治特点和规律自行设计问卷,对潜艇艇员、潜水员共计217人进行调杳.结果 特殊伤现场救护和心理应激渊适培训在潜艇艇员和潜水员之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).特殊武器伤现场救护培训内容中的生物武器伤和化学武器伤救护知识的培训,在潜艇艇员和潜水员之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对核武器伤和新概念武器伤救护知识的培训,在潜艇艇员和潜水员之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 战伤救护知识的培洲已在海勤部队开展,自救瓦救6项技术培训较好,新概念武器伤和特殊伤救护知识的培训开展较差.心理应激调适知识培训欠缺.
目的 瞭解海勤人員戰傷救護知識培訓現狀,為進一步繫統有效地開展培訓提供依據.方法 根據海勤人員的工作環境、戰備訓練及現代海戰傷救治特點和規律自行設計問捲,對潛艇艇員、潛水員共計217人進行調杳.結果 特殊傷現場救護和心理應激淵適培訓在潛艇艇員和潛水員之間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).特殊武器傷現場救護培訓內容中的生物武器傷和化學武器傷救護知識的培訓,在潛艇艇員和潛水員之間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);對覈武器傷和新概唸武器傷救護知識的培訓,在潛艇艇員和潛水員之間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 戰傷救護知識的培洲已在海勤部隊開展,自救瓦救6項技術培訓較好,新概唸武器傷和特殊傷救護知識的培訓開展較差.心理應激調適知識培訓欠缺.
목적 료해해근인원전상구호지식배훈현상,위진일보계통유효지개전배훈제공의거.방법 근거해근인원적공작배경、전비훈련급현대해전상구치특점화규률자행설계문권,대잠정정원、잠수원공계217인진행조묘.결과 특수상현장구호화심리응격연괄배훈재잠정정원화잠수원지간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).특수무기상현장구호배훈내용중적생물무기상화화학무기상구호지식적배훈,재잠정정원화잠수원지간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);대핵무기상화신개념무기상구호지식적배훈,재잠정정원화잠수원지간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 전상구호지식적배주이재해근부대개전,자구와구6항기술배훈교호,신개념무기상화특수상구호지식적배훈개전교차.심리응격조괄지식배훈흠결.
Objective To know the training status of combat injury care among the shipboard naval personnel and to provide a solid base for further systematic training on combat casualty care. Methods A questionnaire was designed in accordance with the working conditions and combat readiness training of shipboard naval personnel, as well as features of modern naval combat casualty care. Then, a survey was made among submariners and divers, totaling 217 people. Results With regard to on-site training on special injury care and psychological stress adjustment training, statistical differences could be seen between submariners and divers(P <0.05). For training on the care of biological and chemical weapon casualties in the training regimen concerning special-weapon on-site casualty care, no statistical differences could be seen between submariners and divers (P>0.05). With regard to training on the care of casualties inflicted by nuclear and new-concept weapons, statistical differences could be seen between submariners and divers (P<0.05). Conclusions Training on routine combat casualty care has been implemented well among the shipboard naval personnel, with 6 basic care techniques of first-aid and buddy-aid being in good progress. However, training on the care of special weapon-induced casualties and other special injuries was not so ideal, and training on psychological stress adjustment was obviously insufficient.
