中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2010年
21期
2905-2906
,共2页
卒中单元%脑血管意外
卒中單元%腦血管意外
졸중단원%뇌혈관의외
Stroke unit%Cerebrovascular accident
目的 探讨基层医院建立卒中单元对脑卒中治疗效果的影响.方法 220例脑卒中患者按入院单双号随机分为A组(110例)及B组(110例),A组建立脑卒中单元,按程序进行治疗,B组按脑卒中治疗常规进行,采用临床神经功能缺损评分(Barthel指数、NIHSS、OHS)评价疗效,比较两组住院病死率、并发症发生率及BI、NIHSS、OHS的差异.结果 A组病死率明显低于B组(χ2=3.12,P<0.05).并发症发生情况:A组明显低于B组(χ2=12.22,P<0.05);A组治疗后Barthel指数、NIHSS评分、OHS评分与B组的比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=11.17、2.31、3.96,均P<0.05).结论 采用卒中单元治疗脑卒中临床效果明显好于传统治疗方法.
目的 探討基層醫院建立卒中單元對腦卒中治療效果的影響.方法 220例腦卒中患者按入院單雙號隨機分為A組(110例)及B組(110例),A組建立腦卒中單元,按程序進行治療,B組按腦卒中治療常規進行,採用臨床神經功能缺損評分(Barthel指數、NIHSS、OHS)評價療效,比較兩組住院病死率、併髮癥髮生率及BI、NIHSS、OHS的差異.結果 A組病死率明顯低于B組(χ2=3.12,P<0.05).併髮癥髮生情況:A組明顯低于B組(χ2=12.22,P<0.05);A組治療後Barthel指數、NIHSS評分、OHS評分與B組的比較,差異均有統計學意義(t=11.17、2.31、3.96,均P<0.05).結論 採用卒中單元治療腦卒中臨床效果明顯好于傳統治療方法.
목적 탐토기층의원건립졸중단원대뇌졸중치료효과적영향.방법 220례뇌졸중환자안입원단쌍호수궤분위A조(110례)급B조(110례),A조건립뇌졸중단원,안정서진행치료,B조안뇌졸중치료상규진행,채용림상신경공능결손평분(Barthel지수、NIHSS、OHS)평개료효,비교량조주원병사솔、병발증발생솔급BI、NIHSS、OHS적차이.결과 A조병사솔명현저우B조(χ2=3.12,P<0.05).병발증발생정황:A조명현저우B조(χ2=12.22,P<0.05);A조치료후Barthel지수、NIHSS평분、OHS평분여B조적비교,차이균유통계학의의(t=11.17、2.31、3.96,균P<0.05).결론 채용졸중단원치료뇌졸중림상효과명현호우전통치료방법.
Objective To investigate the curative effects of establishing stroke unit in treatment of the patients with stroke in primary hospital.Methods 220 patients in hospital who matched the standard were enroued in the study.All patients were assigned either into stroke unit group(Group A,n = 110) or general ward group(Group B,n = 110).The data of the patients of the two groups were compared.The key indexes including mortality and complication were recorded,and other parameters including National Institutes of Barthel Index(BI),Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS),Oxford Handicap Scale(OHS) were observed.Results The mortality and the complications rate of groups A were less than that in Groups B(χ2 =3.12,P<0.05,χ2 = 12.22,P<0.05).The improving extent of all scores (BI、NIHSS 、OHS) in SU group A were significantly different with that in group B.(t = 11.17、2.31、3.96,all P<0.05).Conclusion The patients treated by stroke unit could gain evidently better prognosis than traditional therapy in primary hospital.