CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析地塞米松治疗上呼吸道感染的疗效及不良反应。方法80例上呼吸道感染患儿，随机分为两组。对照组给予抗病毒药物和常规治疗。观察组在对照组用药方式基础上给予地塞米松静脉滴注。结果观察组显效率57.5%高于对照组显效率35.0%，差异有统计学意义（x2=4.073，P＜0.05）。观察组患者治疗后体温恢复速度快于对照组患者，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。观察组不良反应发生率高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论上呼吸道感染患儿采用地塞米松治疗具有比较好的疗效，能够有效减少退热的时间，但是其不良反应发生的概率较大，在临床上需要慎重使用。
목적：분석지새미송치료상호흡도감염적료효급불량반응。방법80례상호흡도감염환인，수궤분위량조。대조조급여항병독약물화상규치료。관찰조재대조조용약방식기출상급여지새미송정맥적주。결과관찰조현효솔57.5%고우대조조현효솔35.0%，차이유통계학의의（x2=4.073，P＜0.05）。관찰조환자치료후체온회복속도쾌우대조조환자，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.01）。관찰조불량반응발생솔고우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론상호흡도감염환인채용지새미송치료구유비교호적료효，능구유효감소퇴열적시간，단시기불량반응발생적개솔교대，재림상상수요신중사용。
Objective To explore the effect and adverse reaction of dexamethasone in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection. Methods 80 children with upper respiratory tract infection, were randomly divided into two groups. Control group: given antiviral drugs and routine treatment. The observation group: the control group method of treatment, and dexamethasone intravenous drip. Results The efficiency of the observation group was 57.5%higher than 35.0%in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (x2=4.073, P<0.05). After treatment, recovery rate of the observation group was faster than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The incidence of adverse reactions, the observation group more than in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Use of dexamethasone in the treatment of children with upper respiratory tract infection, has good effect, can effectively reduce the cooling time, but the occurrence of adverse reactions to a greater probability, need to use caution.