中华创伤杂志
中華創傷雜誌
중화창상잡지
Chinese Journal of Traumatology
2012年
5期
402-406
,共5页
徐炜%陈明%谢宗刚%茅泳涛%周海斌%徐又佳%董启榕
徐煒%陳明%謝宗剛%茅泳濤%週海斌%徐又佳%董啟榕
서위%진명%사종강%모영도%주해빈%서우가%동계용
肩骨折%关节成形术,置换%锁定钢板
肩骨摺%關節成形術,置換%鎖定鋼闆
견골절%관절성형술,치환%쇄정강판
Shoulder fractures%Arthroplasty,replacement%Locking plate
目的 分析锁定钢板与人工肱骨头置换治疗肱骨近端三、四部分骨折的临床疗效.方法 选择2006年6月-2010年6月手术治疗的63例(年龄>55岁)肱骨近端三、四部分骨折的患者.采用切开复位锁定钢板内固定(钢板组)36例,人工肱骨头置换治疗(置换组)27例. 结果 术后平均随访19.7个月,钢板组并发症发生率为28%,内翻畸形愈合、腋神经损伤、肱骨头坏死、异位骨化各1例,撞击综合征4例.置换组并发症发生率为24%,大结节不愈合2例,大结节移位消失、撞击综合征、肩关节半脱位各1例.钢板组三部分骨折Constant- Murtey评分优于置换组(P<0.05).手术时间、出血量、疼痛视觉模拟评分( visual analog scale,VAS)两组差异无统计学意义.四部分骨折Constant - Murley评分和VAS评分两组差异无统计学意义,而手术时间、出血量置换组少于钢板组(P<0.05). 结论 锁定钢板与人工肱骨头置换均是治疗肱骨近端三、四部分骨折的有效手术方式.对患者年龄、骨的质量、骨折类型、粉碎程度及肱骨头坏死可能性的判断对手术方式的选择至关重要.
目的 分析鎖定鋼闆與人工肱骨頭置換治療肱骨近耑三、四部分骨摺的臨床療效.方法 選擇2006年6月-2010年6月手術治療的63例(年齡>55歲)肱骨近耑三、四部分骨摺的患者.採用切開複位鎖定鋼闆內固定(鋼闆組)36例,人工肱骨頭置換治療(置換組)27例. 結果 術後平均隨訪19.7箇月,鋼闆組併髮癥髮生率為28%,內翻畸形愈閤、腋神經損傷、肱骨頭壞死、異位骨化各1例,撞擊綜閤徵4例.置換組併髮癥髮生率為24%,大結節不愈閤2例,大結節移位消失、撞擊綜閤徵、肩關節半脫位各1例.鋼闆組三部分骨摺Constant- Murtey評分優于置換組(P<0.05).手術時間、齣血量、疼痛視覺模擬評分( visual analog scale,VAS)兩組差異無統計學意義.四部分骨摺Constant - Murley評分和VAS評分兩組差異無統計學意義,而手術時間、齣血量置換組少于鋼闆組(P<0.05). 結論 鎖定鋼闆與人工肱骨頭置換均是治療肱骨近耑三、四部分骨摺的有效手術方式.對患者年齡、骨的質量、骨摺類型、粉碎程度及肱骨頭壞死可能性的判斷對手術方式的選擇至關重要.
목적 분석쇄정강판여인공굉골두치환치료굉골근단삼、사부분골절적림상료효.방법 선택2006년6월-2010년6월수술치료적63례(년령>55세)굉골근단삼、사부분골절적환자.채용절개복위쇄정강판내고정(강판조)36례,인공굉골두치환치료(치환조)27례. 결과 술후평균수방19.7개월,강판조병발증발생솔위28%,내번기형유합、액신경손상、굉골두배사、이위골화각1례,당격종합정4례.치환조병발증발생솔위24%,대결절불유합2례,대결절이위소실、당격종합정、견관절반탈위각1례.강판조삼부분골절Constant- Murtey평분우우치환조(P<0.05).수술시간、출혈량、동통시각모의평분( visual analog scale,VAS)량조차이무통계학의의.사부분골절Constant - Murley평분화VAS평분량조차이무통계학의의,이수술시간、출혈량치환조소우강판조(P<0.05). 결론 쇄정강판여인공굉골두치환균시치료굉골근단삼、사부분골절적유효수술방식.대환자년령、골적질량、골절류형、분쇄정도급굉골두배사가능성적판단대수술방식적선택지관중요.
Objective To analyze the clinical outcome of locking plate and hemiarthroplasty in treatment of Neer three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures. Methods A totalof 63 consecutive patients aged over 55 years with Neer three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically from June 2006 to June 2010.In the retrospective study,36 patients were treated by open reduction and locking plate fixation ( locking plate fixation group) and 27 patients treated by hemiarthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty group).Clinical outcomes including operation time,blood loss,visual analog scale ( VAS),Constant-Murley score and complications were evaluated. Results The average 19.7 months follow-up showed complication rate of 28% in the locking plate group,including one patient with varss malunion,one with axillary nerve injury,one with humeral head necrosis,one with heterotopie calcification and four with impingement syndrome.The complication rate was 24% in the hemiarthroplasty group,including two patients with tuberosity nonunion,one with tuberosity migration,one with impingement syndrome and one with joint semiluxation.The mean Constant-Murley score of three-part fractures in the locking plate group was ( 76.5 ±5.8) points,better than (69.2 ±7.2) points in the hemiarthroplasty group (P <0.05 ).While the two groups showed no significant differences with regards to operation time,blood loss and visual analog scale (VAS).As for the four-part fractures,the mean operation time was shorter and the mean blood loss was less in the hemiarthroplasty group compared with the locking plate group (P <0.05),while there were no obvious differences in VAS score and Constant-Murley score between the two groups. Conclusions Both locking plate and hemiarthroplasty are the reliable methods for the three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures.The patients' age,bone quality,fracture type,comminution degree and evaluation of osteonecrosis possibility,are critical for surgery decision.