中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2010年
5期
469-471
,共3页
王涛%肖世富%方贻儒%李霞%李冠军%朱敏捷%周金娣%沈莉莉%王海红%钱时兴
王濤%肖世富%方貽儒%李霞%李冠軍%硃敏捷%週金娣%瀋莉莉%王海紅%錢時興
왕도%초세부%방이유%리하%리관군%주민첩%주금제%침리리%왕해홍%전시흥
神经精神症状问卷%信度%效度
神經精神癥狀問捲%信度%效度
신경정신증상문권%신도%효도
Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory%Reliability%Validity
目的 评估神经精神症状问卷中文版(Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory,CNPI)的信度和效度.方法 对2004年至2008年间到上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心就诊的219例阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的照料者进行CNPI的测试,每例被测试者在4周后均进行重测.应用SPSS11.0统计软件进行信效度分析.结果 CNPI症状分问卷Cronbach α系数为0.69,CNPI苦恼分问卷Cronbach α系数为0.72.重测相关系数在0.66～0.98之间(P<0.001),其中症状分问卷总分相关系数为0.96(P<0.001),苦恼分问卷总分相关系数为0.94(P<0.001);对症状分问卷12个条目进行主轴因子分析产生5个公因子,累积解释变异量为67.0%;对苦恼分问卷12个条目进行主轴因子分析也产生5个公因子,累积解释变异量为70.2%.结论 CNPI的同质性信度和重测信度较高,内容效度和结构效度较好.
目的 評估神經精神癥狀問捲中文版(Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory,CNPI)的信度和效度.方法 對2004年至2008年間到上海交通大學醫學院附屬精神衛生中心就診的219例阿爾茨海默病(AD)患者的照料者進行CNPI的測試,每例被測試者在4週後均進行重測.應用SPSS11.0統計軟件進行信效度分析.結果 CNPI癥狀分問捲Cronbach α繫數為0.69,CNPI苦惱分問捲Cronbach α繫數為0.72.重測相關繫數在0.66～0.98之間(P<0.001),其中癥狀分問捲總分相關繫數為0.96(P<0.001),苦惱分問捲總分相關繫數為0.94(P<0.001);對癥狀分問捲12箇條目進行主軸因子分析產生5箇公因子,纍積解釋變異量為67.0%;對苦惱分問捲12箇條目進行主軸因子分析也產生5箇公因子,纍積解釋變異量為70.2%.結論 CNPI的同質性信度和重測信度較高,內容效度和結構效度較好.
목적 평고신경정신증상문권중문판(Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory,CNPI)적신도화효도.방법 대2004년지2008년간도상해교통대학의학원부속정신위생중심취진적219례아이자해묵병(AD)환자적조료자진행CNPI적측시,매례피측시자재4주후균진행중측.응용SPSS11.0통계연건진행신효도분석.결과 CNPI증상분문권Cronbach α계수위0.69,CNPI고뇌분문권Cronbach α계수위0.72.중측상관계수재0.66～0.98지간(P<0.001),기중증상분문권총분상관계수위0.96(P<0.001),고뇌분문권총분상관계수위0.94(P<0.001);대증상분문권12개조목진행주축인자분석산생5개공인자,루적해석변이량위67.0%;대고뇌분문권12개조목진행주축인자분석야산생5개공인자,루적해석변이량위70.2%.결론 CNPI적동질성신도화중측신도교고,내용효도화결구효도교호.
Objective To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory (CNPI). Methods The CNPI was administered to 219 caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Each caregiver was retested 4 weeks after initial testing. Results The Cronbach a coefficient of the total symptom scale was 0.69. The Cronbach α coefficient of the total caregiver distress subscale was 0.72. The Cronbach α coefficient of the entire inventory was 0. 82. The test-retest coefficients ranged from 0.66 to 0.98 (P < 0.01). Principal axis factoring analysis of the symptom subscale yielded a five-factor solution which contributed to 67.0% of the cumulative variance. Factor 1, which included aberrant motor behavior, hallucinations, delusion and irritability had the most significant contribution to the cumulative variance. Principal axis factoring analysis of the caregiver distress subscale also yielded a five-factor solution which contributed to 70.2% of the cumulative variance. Factor 1, which included depression, delusion, sleep/night behavior, aberrant motor behavior, and irritability had the most significant contribution to the cumulative variance. Conclusion This Chinese version of NPI is a reliable and valid tool for measuring neuropsychiatric disturbances in patients with AD.
