白血病·淋巴瘤
白血病·淋巴瘤
백혈병·림파류
JOURNAL OF LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
2010年
3期
140-142
,共3页
莫文健%毛平%王顺清%陈小卫%许世林
莫文健%毛平%王順清%陳小衛%許世林
막문건%모평%왕순청%진소위%허세림
白血病,单核细胞,急性%抗肿瘤联合化疗方案
白血病,單覈細胞,急性%抗腫瘤聯閤化療方案
백혈병,단핵세포,급성%항종류연합화료방안
Leukemia,monocytic,acute%Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols
目的 比较MT方案(米托蒽醌联合替尼泊苷)和DA方案(柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷)治疗初治急性单核细胞性白血病的疗效及患者不良反应.方法 将初治急性单核细胞性白血病患者40例随机(单纯随机抽样法)分成两组,MT组23例、DA组17例,分别采用MT、DA方案诱导缓解,比较两组的临床疗效及患者不良反应.结果 MT组、DA组第一次化疗完全缓解率分别为65%(15/23)、18%(3/17),总完全缓解率为83%(19/23)、47%(8/17),有效率分别为91%(21/23)、59%(10/17),两组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组均出现明显的造血功能抑制,两组间白细胞最低点、白细胞<1×10~9/L的持续时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但MT组的白细胞最低点出现时间、白细胞<1×10~9/L的开始、结束时间均较迟,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).结论 MT方案治疗初治急性单核细胞性白血病完全缓解率、有效率均明显优于DA方案,方案较简单、有效,可作为初治急性单核细胞性白血病诱导缓解的较佳方案.两组骨髓抑制程度相当,但MT组骨髓抑制发生时间较DA组迟,治疗同时须注意适时加强抗感染、支持治疗.
目的 比較MT方案(米託蒽醌聯閤替尼泊苷)和DA方案(柔紅黴素聯閤阿糖胞苷)治療初治急性單覈細胞性白血病的療效及患者不良反應.方法 將初治急性單覈細胞性白血病患者40例隨機(單純隨機抽樣法)分成兩組,MT組23例、DA組17例,分彆採用MT、DA方案誘導緩解,比較兩組的臨床療效及患者不良反應.結果 MT組、DA組第一次化療完全緩解率分彆為65%(15/23)、18%(3/17),總完全緩解率為83%(19/23)、47%(8/17),有效率分彆為91%(21/23)、59%(10/17),兩組差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).兩組均齣現明顯的造血功能抑製,兩組間白細胞最低點、白細胞<1×10~9/L的持續時間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但MT組的白細胞最低點齣現時間、白細胞<1×10~9/L的開始、結束時間均較遲,兩組差異有統計學意義(P<0.01).結論 MT方案治療初治急性單覈細胞性白血病完全緩解率、有效率均明顯優于DA方案,方案較簡單、有效,可作為初治急性單覈細胞性白血病誘導緩解的較佳方案.兩組骨髓抑製程度相噹,但MT組骨髓抑製髮生時間較DA組遲,治療同時鬚註意適時加彊抗感染、支持治療.
목적 비교MT방안(미탁은곤연합체니박감)화DA방안(유홍매소연합아당포감)치료초치급성단핵세포성백혈병적료효급환자불량반응.방법 장초치급성단핵세포성백혈병환자40례수궤(단순수궤추양법)분성량조,MT조23례、DA조17례,분별채용MT、DA방안유도완해,비교량조적림상료효급환자불량반응.결과 MT조、DA조제일차화료완전완해솔분별위65%(15/23)、18%(3/17),총완전완해솔위83%(19/23)、47%(8/17),유효솔분별위91%(21/23)、59%(10/17),량조차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).량조균출현명현적조혈공능억제,량조간백세포최저점、백세포<1×10~9/L적지속시간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단MT조적백세포최저점출현시간、백세포<1×10~9/L적개시、결속시간균교지,량조차이유통계학의의(P<0.01).결론 MT방안치료초치급성단핵세포성백혈병완전완해솔、유효솔균명현우우DA방안,방안교간단、유효,가작위초치급성단핵세포성백혈병유도완해적교가방안.량조골수억제정도상당,단MT조골수억제발생시간교DA조지,치료동시수주의괄시가강항감염、지지치료.
Objective To compare the therapeutic and adverse effects of MT regimen (mitoxantrone plus teniposide) and DA regimen (daunorubicin plus cytarabine) on initial treatment to acute monocytic leukemia. Methods 40 patients with initial treatment to acute monocytic leukemia were randomly divided into MT group(n=23) and DA group(n=17). All patients were treated with MT or DA regimen. The result and adverse effects of the two regimens were compared. Results Complete remission(CR) rate in the first course chemotherapy in MT and DA regimen was 65 % and 18 %, respectively. The total CR rate in MT and DA regimen was 83 % and 47 % respectively. The total effective rate was 92 % and 59 %, respectively. Significant differences were found. Severe myelosuppression occurred in both groups. The counts of wbc nadir and the durations of wbc less than 1×10~9/L were not significantly different in two group. The time points of wbc nadir, the start and end time points of wbc less than 1×10~9/L were significantly later in MT group than in DA group. Conclusion MT regimen is significant better than DA regimen in inducing remission in initial treatment acute monocytic leukemia, and it is a good choice for inducing remission strategy. The degrees of myelosuppression in two groups are similar. But the occurrent time of myelosuppression is later in MT group than in DA group. The great attention should be paid to anti-infection and support therapy at time properly.