CAJ | 학술논문

在法国,为了防止行政主体的侵害,公务员具有行政上的保护手段和司法上的保护手段;在中国,公务员只能通过申诉控告维护自己的权益。中法两国在公务员救济制度方面的不同缘于两国在公务员关系理论、权利规定及行政诉讼等方面的不同。借鉴法国的经验,结合我国的具体国情,完善中国的公务员救济制度应该从以下三个方面着手：第一,摒弃特别权力关系理论;第二,扩大公务员权利范围;第三,完善公务员救济途径。
재법국,위료방지행정주체적침해,공무원구유행정상적보호수단화사법상적보호수단;재중국,공무원지능통과신소공고유호자기적권익。중법량국재공무원구제제도방면적불동연우량국재공무원관계이론、권리규정급행정소송등방면적불동。차감법국적경험,결합아국적구체국정,완선중국적공무원구제제도응해종이하삼개방면착수：제일,병기특별권력관계이론;제이,확대공무원권리범위;제삼,완선공무원구제도경。
In France,the administrative body in order to prevent violations of the civil service protection with administrative means and judicial means of protection;in China,the civil service only through the complaint,to protect their interests.The difference between France and China in the civil service system is due to the difference of Civil relations theory,regulations and administrative litigation rights between the two countries.Learn from the experience of France,combined with China＇s specific national conditions,improve China＇s civil relief system should be from the following three aspects：first,to abandon the theory of power relations in particular;second,to expand the scope of civil rights;third,improved civil remedies.