华南理工大学学报:社会科学版
華南理工大學學報:社會科學版
화남리공대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
2011年
6期
13-18
,共6页
人文社科%评价制度%同行评议
人文社科%評價製度%同行評議
인문사과%평개제도%동행평의
humanities and social sciences%evaluation system%peer review
通过对当前国外人文社科研究发展趋势分析,对美欧日等国成果评价制度进行比较,以期启迪我国人文社科发展,为健全成果评价制度提供经验借鉴。通过分析比较,提出以改进考核方式、完善成果评价体系和建立健全小同行评议专家库等措施,来完善我国人文社科成果评价制度。
通過對噹前國外人文社科研究髮展趨勢分析,對美歐日等國成果評價製度進行比較,以期啟迪我國人文社科髮展,為健全成果評價製度提供經驗藉鑒。通過分析比較,提齣以改進攷覈方式、完善成果評價體繫和建立健全小同行評議專傢庫等措施,來完善我國人文社科成果評價製度。
통과대당전국외인문사과연구발전추세분석,대미구일등국성과평개제도진행비교,이기계적아국인문사과발전,위건전성과평개제도제공경험차감。통과분석비교,제출이개진고핵방식、완선성과평개체계화건립건전소동행평의전가고등조시,래완선아국인문사과성과평개제도。
This thesis analyses the development of humanities and social sciences abroad and takes USA, EU and Japan for examples to compare their evaluation systems of research achievements, so that we can learn some experience for further development. Through analysis and comparison, some measures are taken for improving our evaluation system of humanities and social sciences, e.g. improving the methods and technology of evaluation, establishing the experts' tank of peer review.