CAJ | 학술논문

[目的]探讨3种脲醛泡沫栽培基质建植高羊茅草坪的可行性,并对草坪质量进行评定.[方法]将草坪外观质量、生态质量和实用指标作为综合质量评定的一级指标,把对应的草坪密度、色泽、质地、均一性,绿期、盖度、生物量,出苗势、生物量、成坪时间作为综合质量评定的二级指标,采用层次分析法(AHP),通过构建权重矩阵,对所评价草坪指标配以权重,然后结合模糊数学综合评判方法,确定草坪质量优劣.[结果]脲醛泡沫栽培基质覆土处理草坪综合质量优于未覆土处理及常规处理,F1处理草坪质量综合评价值最高,为0.770.[结论]脲醛泡沫栽培基质能够生产出优质的草坪,可进一步推广利用.
[목적]탐토3충뇨철포말재배기질건식고양모초평적가행성,병대초평질량진행평정.[방법]장초평외관질량、생태질량화실용지표작위종합질량평정적일급지표,파대응적초평밀도、색택、질지、균일성,록기、개도、생물량,출묘세、생물량、성평시간작위종합질량평정적이급지표,채용층차분석법(AHP),통과구건권중구진,대소평개초평지표배이권중,연후결합모호수학종합평판방법,학정초평질량우렬.[결과]뇨철포말재배기질복토처리초평종합질량우우미복토처리급상규처리,F1처리초평질량종합평개치최고,위0.770.[결론]뇨철포말재배기질능구생산출우질적초평,가진일보추엄이용.
[Objective] The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of three kinds of urea formaldehyde foam substrate in tall fescua estab- lishment as well as to study on evaluation of turf quality. [Method] The visual estimates, ecological quality estimates and utility quality estimates were used as the 1 st level indicators, and the density, color, texture, uniformity, green period, cover degree, biomass, emergence energy, growth rate and turf -forming time were used as the corresponding 2nd level indicators. With T. L. Satty's method Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the fuzzy synthesis evaluation method, the weight ratio of matrix was obtained and the synthetic evaluation result was accorded with facts, then it could be regarded as the satisfying value of weight. [Result] The quality of three covering soil treatments was better than that of uncovering treatment and conventional treatment, the quality synthetic evaluation of F1 was the best, which was about 0.770. [Conclusion] Ure- a formaldehyde foam substrate showed high quality for turf establishment, which could be further spread and applied.