国际检验医学杂志
國際檢驗醫學雜誌
국제검험의학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
2008年
7期
588-591
,共4页
曾建明%王莹%陈茶%庞鑫%王丽娜%吕国全%庄俊华
曾建明%王瑩%陳茶%龐鑫%王麗娜%呂國全%莊俊華
증건명%왕형%진다%방흠%왕려나%려국전%장준화
质量控制%概率%规范%评价研究
質量控製%概率%規範%評價研究
질량공제%개솔%규범%평개연구
Control,Quality%Probability%Benehmarking%Evaluation Studies
目的 为COULTER STK全自动细胞分析仪选择满足临床质量要求的质控规则.方法 以CLIA88能力比对验证为"允许总误差"对每项测定规定质量要求,确定各测定方法稳定操作下的不精密度或标准差、不准确度或偏倚,绘制操作过程规范图,画出操作点,通过评价候选质控方法的误差检出概率(Ped)和假失控概率(Pfr),选择质控规则.结果 血红蛋白、白细胞、MCV、MCH使用13.5s质控规则(n=1);红细胞、MCHC使用13s质控规则(n=1);红细胞压积使用12.5s质控规则(n=1);血小板使用Westgard多规则(13s/22s/R4s/41s/10xn=2)均可达到90%的Ped.白细胞低值标本不准确度较大(偏倚4.5%),采用13s/22s/R4s/41s/8x多规则进行判断,n=2时Pfr为0.038,Ped为50%.结论 通过操作过程规范图能够简便地选择满足临床检验所需要的质控规则和质控品测定的个数,使误差检出概率和假失控概率达到临床工作的要求.
目的 為COULTER STK全自動細胞分析儀選擇滿足臨床質量要求的質控規則.方法 以CLIA88能力比對驗證為"允許總誤差"對每項測定規定質量要求,確定各測定方法穩定操作下的不精密度或標準差、不準確度或偏倚,繪製操作過程規範圖,畫齣操作點,通過評價候選質控方法的誤差檢齣概率(Ped)和假失控概率(Pfr),選擇質控規則.結果 血紅蛋白、白細胞、MCV、MCH使用13.5s質控規則(n=1);紅細胞、MCHC使用13s質控規則(n=1);紅細胞壓積使用12.5s質控規則(n=1);血小闆使用Westgard多規則(13s/22s/R4s/41s/10xn=2)均可達到90%的Ped.白細胞低值標本不準確度較大(偏倚4.5%),採用13s/22s/R4s/41s/8x多規則進行判斷,n=2時Pfr為0.038,Ped為50%.結論 通過操作過程規範圖能夠簡便地選擇滿足臨床檢驗所需要的質控規則和質控品測定的箇數,使誤差檢齣概率和假失控概率達到臨床工作的要求.
목적 위COULTER STK전자동세포분석의선택만족림상질량요구적질공규칙.방법 이CLIA88능력비대험증위"윤허총오차"대매항측정규정질량요구,학정각측정방법은정조작하적불정밀도혹표준차、불준학도혹편의,회제조작과정규범도,화출조작점,통과평개후선질공방법적오차검출개솔(Ped)화가실공개솔(Pfr),선택질공규칙.결과 혈홍단백、백세포、MCV、MCH사용13.5s질공규칙(n=1);홍세포、MCHC사용13s질공규칙(n=1);홍세포압적사용12.5s질공규칙(n=1);혈소판사용Westgard다규칙(13s/22s/R4s/41s/10xn=2)균가체도90%적Ped.백세포저치표본불준학도교대(편의4.5%),채용13s/22s/R4s/41s/8x다규칙진행판단,n=2시Pfr위0.038,Ped위50%.결론 통과조작과정규범도능구간편지선택만족림상검험소수요적질공규칙화질공품측정적개수,사오차검출개솔화가실공개솔체도림상공작적요구.
Objective To design the quality control procedure needed to satisfy clinical quality requirement for COULTER STK automatic hematology analyzer. Methods The analytical quality re- quirement was defined for the test with an allowable total error (Tea) needed to satisfy the given CLIA88 proficiency testing (PT) criteria. The imprecision or standard deviation from internal quality control and inaccuracy or biases from external quality control were determined under stable perform- ance. The Operational Process Specifications Chart (OPSpecs chart) was drawed, and the operating points were marked. The quality control rule was selected by assessing the probabilities of error detec- tion and false rejection for candidate control procedure. Results 13.5s, (n=1), 13s(n = 1 ), 12.5s quality control rule (n= 1) and Westgard multi-rule (13s/2,2s/R,4s/41s/10) (n=2) was applied in the measure- ment of hemoglobin, WBC, MCV and MCH respectively. The probability of error detection accounted for 90%. The inaccuracy of WBC low valued samples was relatively higher (bias value was 4.5 %). The probability of error detection and false rejection was 50% and 0. 038 respectively when Westgard multi-rule (13s/23s/R,4s/10)(n=2) was applied in the measurement of platelet. Conclusion UP- Specs chart can provide an easy way to select quality control rule and number of quality control samples so as to ensure the probabilities of error detection and false rejection achieving the demand of the clin- ic.