CAJ | 학술논문

目的观察对比Vitapex糊剂和樟脑酚的根管封药效果.方法 218颗有瘘型慢性根尖周炎的患牙经过根管预备后分为实验组(Vitapex糊剂封药组)和对照组(樟脑酚封药组),对封药后患牙疗效及对根管治疗期间急症疼痛的发生率进行比较.结果实验组有效率97.25%,对照组有效率89.91%,两组疗效有显著性差异(P<0.05):实验组和对照组急症疼痛发生率分别为4.59%和16.51%,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05).结论 Vitapex糊剂根管内封药能有效控制感染和预防根管治疗期间疼痛的发生.
목적 관찰대비Vitapex호제화장뇌분적근관봉약효과.방법 218과유루형만성근첨주염적환아경과근관예비후분위실험조(Vitapex호제봉약조)화대조조(장뇌분봉약조),대봉약후환아료효급대근관치료기간급증동통적발생솔진행비교.결과 실험조유효솔97.25%,대조조유효솔89.91%,량조료효유현저성차이(P<0.05):실험조화대조조급증동통발생솔분별위4.59%화16.51%,량조비교유현저성차이(P<0.05).결론 Vitapex호제근관내봉약능유효공제감염화예방근관치료기간동통적발생.
Objective To compare the clinical effect of Vitapex paste (calcium hydroxide based paste) and Camphorated Para-monochlorophenol (CP) when used as root canal medicaments. Method 218 patients with chronic apical periodontitis were randomly divided into Vitapex paste group as experimental group and the CP group as control group. The therapeutic effect and incidence rate of endedontic interappointment pain(EIP)between them were compared after filled as root canal medicaments, Result The effective ratio of Vitapex paste group and CP group were 97.25% and 89.91%, respectively. The incidence of EIP of Vitapex paste group and CP group were 4.59% and 16. 51%, respectively. The difference between them was statistically significant (chi-square, P<0.01). Conclusion This study showed that Vitapex paste can prevent the infection and incidence of EIP in the root canal of chronic apical periodontitis efficiently better than CP.