中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2012年
14期
2094-2095
,共2页
杨越红%潘敏%林建%陈雪梅
楊越紅%潘敏%林建%陳雪梅
양월홍%반민%림건%진설매
癌,子宫内膜样%腹腔镜检查%妇科外科手术
癌,子宮內膜樣%腹腔鏡檢查%婦科外科手術
암,자궁내막양%복강경검사%부과외과수술
Carcinoma,endometrioid%Laparoscopy%Gynecologic surgical procedures
目的 比较腹腔镜辅助阴式与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析180例早期子宫内膜癌患者的临床资料,随机分为两组,开腹组行常规开腹子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术,腹腔镜组行腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间、清扫淋巴结数量、并发症情况.结果 两组手术时间、术中出血量、清扫淋巴结数量比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),腹腔镜组肛门排气时间及住院时间短于开腹组(t=2.898、2.564,均P<0.05).两组并发症发生率(11.0%与19.1%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).随访时间为3~27个月,两组复发率(6.6%与5.6%)及生存率(98.9%与97.8%)差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 腹腔镜辅助阴式手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的临床疗效优于开腹手术,具有微创、恢复快等优点,在早期子宫内膜癌治疗中有重要价值.
目的 比較腹腔鏡輔助陰式與開腹手術治療早期子宮內膜癌的臨床療效.方法 迴顧性分析180例早期子宮內膜癌患者的臨床資料,隨機分為兩組,開腹組行常規開腹子宮切除術及盆腔淋巴結清掃術,腹腔鏡組行腹腔鏡輔助陰式子宮切除術及盆腔淋巴結清掃術,比較兩組手術時間、術中齣血量、肛門排氣時間、住院時間、清掃淋巴結數量、併髮癥情況.結果 兩組手術時間、術中齣血量、清掃淋巴結數量比較差異均無統計學意義(均P>0.05),腹腔鏡組肛門排氣時間及住院時間短于開腹組(t=2.898、2.564,均P<0.05).兩組併髮癥髮生率(11.0%與19.1%)差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).隨訪時間為3~27箇月,兩組複髮率(6.6%與5.6%)及生存率(98.9%與97.8%)差異均無統計學意義(均P>0.05).結論 腹腔鏡輔助陰式手術治療早期子宮內膜癌的臨床療效優于開腹手術,具有微創、恢複快等優點,在早期子宮內膜癌治療中有重要價值.
목적 비교복강경보조음식여개복수술치료조기자궁내막암적림상료효.방법 회고성분석180례조기자궁내막암환자적림상자료,수궤분위량조,개복조행상규개복자궁절제술급분강림파결청소술,복강경조행복강경보조음식자궁절제술급분강림파결청소술,비교량조수술시간、술중출혈량、항문배기시간、주원시간、청소림파결수량、병발증정황.결과 량조수술시간、술중출혈량、청소림파결수량비교차이균무통계학의의(균P>0.05),복강경조항문배기시간급주원시간단우개복조(t=2.898、2.564,균P<0.05).량조병발증발생솔(11.0%여19.1%)차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).수방시간위3~27개월,량조복발솔(6.6%여5.6%)급생존솔(98.9%여97.8%)차이균무통계학의의(균P>0.05).결론 복강경보조음식수술치료조기자궁내막암적림상료효우우개복수술,구유미창、회복쾌등우점,재조기자궁내막암치료중유중요개치.
Objective To compared the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal and laparotomy in the treatment of early endometrial cancer.Methods CLinical data of 180 patients with endometrial cancer were analyzed retrospectively,which were randomly divided into two groups:The laparotomy group were underwent conventional abdominal hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy;Laparoscopic group were underwent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.Operative time,blood loss,recovery time of gastrointestinal function,length of stay,the number of harvested lymph nodes,complications were compared.Results There were no significant differences in operative time,blood loss,the number of lymph nodes cleaned up between two groups(P >0.05).Recovery time of gastrointestinal function,and length of stay in the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than the laparotomy group,the differences were statistically significant(t =2.898,2.564,P <0.05).The complication rates(11.0% vs 19.1%) were no significant difference(P > 0.05).Following up for 3 months to 27 months,recurfence rates(6.6% vs 5.6%) and survival rates(98.9% vs 97.8 %) were no significant difference(all P > 0.05).Conciusion The clinical efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal surgical treatment for early endornetrial cancer was significantly superior to laparotomy surgery with advantage of minimally invasive,quick recovery.