CAJ | 학술논문

目的分析视神经萎缩患者的周视性质.方法选择各种原因导致的视神经萎缩患者79例119只眼,分别以检眼镜法和Nidec MP-1微视野仪检测其固视性质,并对检测结果进行比较.结果以检眼镜法检测,73只眼表现为中心固视,46只眼表现为中心外固视；以微视野法检测,73只眼表现为稳定的中心固视,46只眼表现为中心外固视,其中相对不稳定固视23只眼,不稳定固视23只眼.中心固视眼视力明显好于中心外固视眼(P＜0.05).结论检眼镜法检测视神经萎缩患者的固视性质时可以明确区分中心固视和中心外固视,微视野法则可以进一步对固视的稳定性加以分析.
목적 분석시신경위축환자적주시성질.방법 선택각충원인도치적시신경위축환자79례119지안,분별이검안경법화Nidec MP-1미시야의검측기고시성질,병대검측결과진행비교.결과 이검안경법검측,73지안표현위중심고시,46지안표현위중심외고시；이미시야법검측,73지안표현위은정적중심고시,46지안표현위중심외고시,기중상대불은정고시23지안,불은정고시23지안.중심고시안시력명현호우중심외고시안(P＜0.05).결론 검안경법검측시신경위축환자적고시성질시가이명학구분중심고시화중심외고시,미시야법칙가이진일보대고시적은정성가이분석.
Objective To investigate the microperimetery fixation features in optic atrophy eyes.Methods Seventy-nine patients with 119 optic atrophy eyes were enrolled in this study.The fixation features were measured by direct ophthalmoscope and Nidec MP-1 microperimeter respectively,and then the results were compared.Results There were 73 eyes manifesting central fixation,46 eyes with eccentric fixation by the direct ophthalmoscope.There were 73 eyes manifesting predominantly central and stable fixation,23 eyes with predominantly eccentric and relative unstable fixation,and 23eyes with predominantly eccentric and unstable fixation.BCVA of the central fixation eyes were better than the eccentric fixation ones (P ＜0.05).Conclusions The difference between central and eccentric fixation can be detected definitely by the direct ophthalmoscope in the optic atrophy eyes,while microperimetery can manifest fixation location and stability in details.