中国生态农业学报
中國生態農業學報
중국생태농업학보
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ECO-AGRICULTURE
2010年
2期
223-228
,共6页
吴玉红%田霄鸿%南雄雄%池文博%闫小丽%朱瑞祥%同延安
吳玉紅%田霄鴻%南雄雄%池文博%閆小麗%硃瑞祥%同延安
오옥홍%전소홍%남웅웅%지문박%염소려%주서상%동연안
保护性耕作%土壤质量%因子分析%聚类分析
保護性耕作%土壤質量%因子分析%聚類分析
보호성경작%토양질량%인자분석%취류분석
Conservation tillage%Soil quality%Factor analysis%Cluster analysis
基于长期定位试验, 选择12项反映土壤质量特性的定量因子作为评价指标, 采用因子分析对不同耕作模式的土壤质量进行综合评价, 并运用欧氏距离最短法对其进行聚类分析.12项理化及生物属性指标归纳为5个公因子: 保肥供肥因子、有机质因子、容重因子、磷素因子、酶活性因子.因子得分的结果表明: 不同耕作模式的5个公因子优势差异明显.相比较而言传统耕作的土壤质量综合得分最低, 说明在研究区保护性耕作模式条件下土壤在物理、化学、生物学性质方面都有所改善, 土壤质量有所提高.土壤质量综合得分最高的前3种处理为隔年深松(NS2)、秸秆覆盖联合浅松、旋耕(SR2)、连年深松(NS3), 说明深松、旋耕及秸秆还田与旋耕技术联合作业在改善土壤结构和培肥土壤方面优势更突出.聚类分析结果表明, 同一耕作措施的不同模式土壤质量差异较小, 说明在本研究试验条件下, 耕作措施是影响土壤质量的关键因素.
基于長期定位試驗, 選擇12項反映土壤質量特性的定量因子作為評價指標, 採用因子分析對不同耕作模式的土壤質量進行綜閤評價, 併運用歐氏距離最短法對其進行聚類分析.12項理化及生物屬性指標歸納為5箇公因子: 保肥供肥因子、有機質因子、容重因子、燐素因子、酶活性因子.因子得分的結果錶明: 不同耕作模式的5箇公因子優勢差異明顯.相比較而言傳統耕作的土壤質量綜閤得分最低, 說明在研究區保護性耕作模式條件下土壤在物理、化學、生物學性質方麵都有所改善, 土壤質量有所提高.土壤質量綜閤得分最高的前3種處理為隔年深鬆(NS2)、秸稈覆蓋聯閤淺鬆、鏇耕(SR2)、連年深鬆(NS3), 說明深鬆、鏇耕及秸稈還田與鏇耕技術聯閤作業在改善土壤結構和培肥土壤方麵優勢更突齣.聚類分析結果錶明, 同一耕作措施的不同模式土壤質量差異較小, 說明在本研究試驗條件下, 耕作措施是影響土壤質量的關鍵因素.
기우장기정위시험, 선택12항반영토양질량특성적정량인자작위평개지표, 채용인자분석대불동경작모식적토양질량진행종합평개, 병운용구씨거리최단법대기진행취류분석.12항이화급생물속성지표귀납위5개공인자: 보비공비인자、유궤질인자、용중인자、린소인자、매활성인자.인자득분적결과표명: 불동경작모식적5개공인자우세차이명현.상비교이언전통경작적토양질량종합득분최저, 설명재연구구보호성경작모식조건하토양재물리、화학、생물학성질방면도유소개선, 토양질량유소제고.토양질량종합득분최고적전3충처리위격년심송(NS2)、갈간복개연합천송、선경(SR2)、련년심송(NS3), 설명심송、선경급갈간환전여선경기술연합작업재개선토양결구화배비토양방면우세경돌출.취류분석결과표명, 동일경작조시적불동모식토양질량차이교소, 설명재본연구시험조건하, 경작조시시영향토양질량적관건인소.
In this study, factor (FA) and cluster (CA) analyses were used to evaluate the effect of the patterns of conservation tillage on soil quality. The squared Euclidean distance method of hierarchical cluster analysis was used for the cluster analysis. Twelve quantitative indicators related to soil property were selected based on results from long-term experimentation. Using factor analysis, five soil common quality factors (i.e., maintenance and supply capacity of soil nutrient, organic matter, phosphorus, bulk density, and enzyme activity) were derived from 12 soil chemical, physical and biological attributes. Factor scores show significant differences in superiority of the five common factors under different tillage patterns. Soil quality scores for conservation tillage (CT) are higher compared with traditional tillage (TT), implying improved soil physical, chemical and biological properties along with soil quality under CT. The top three integrated patterns with the highest scores include 30 cm subsoiling at one-year interval (NS2); combined straw mulching and 20 cm subsoiling, rotary tillage (SR2); and 30 cm subsoiling at yearly interval (NS3). This suggests outstanding advantage of the top integrated patterns in improving soil structure, soil fertility and overall soil quality. CA shows small differences in soil quality among different patterns under one tillage practice, indicating that tillage measurement is the key factor of soil quality.