生态学报
生態學報
생태학보
ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA
2009年
11期
5882-5890
,共9页
城市生态系统%能值分析%可持续发展
城市生態繫統%能值分析%可持續髮展
성시생태계통%능치분석%가지속발전
urban ecosystem%emergy analysis%sustainable development
运用能值(emergy)分析方法,以京津冀地区的北京、天津、唐山为研究对象,建立了复合生态系统与可持续发展的能值指标,对3个城市1991~2005年自然环境与社会经济可持续发展状况进行了比较分析.研究结果表明:1991~2005年期间,由于北京、天津的本地资源能值对经济发展的驱动力不足,城市发展对外部输入能值的依赖程度越来越高;北京、天津、唐山社会子系统的能值指标均呈上升趋势,城市居民生活水平和经济发展水平不断提高;北京经济子系统的各项指标均优于天津和唐山,但环境子系统和能值可持续指标体现出,北京的环境压力最大、可持续发展能力低于天津和唐山.在此分析基础上,对北京、天津、唐山的可持续发展提出了几点建议,为制定城市发展策略和产业调整提供科学依据.
運用能值(emergy)分析方法,以京津冀地區的北京、天津、唐山為研究對象,建立瞭複閤生態繫統與可持續髮展的能值指標,對3箇城市1991~2005年自然環境與社會經濟可持續髮展狀況進行瞭比較分析.研究結果錶明:1991~2005年期間,由于北京、天津的本地資源能值對經濟髮展的驅動力不足,城市髮展對外部輸入能值的依賴程度越來越高;北京、天津、唐山社會子繫統的能值指標均呈上升趨勢,城市居民生活水平和經濟髮展水平不斷提高;北京經濟子繫統的各項指標均優于天津和唐山,但環境子繫統和能值可持續指標體現齣,北京的環境壓力最大、可持續髮展能力低于天津和唐山.在此分析基礎上,對北京、天津、唐山的可持續髮展提齣瞭幾點建議,為製定城市髮展策略和產業調整提供科學依據.
운용능치(emergy)분석방법,이경진기지구적북경、천진、당산위연구대상,건립료복합생태계통여가지속발전적능치지표,대3개성시1991~2005년자연배경여사회경제가지속발전상황진행료비교분석.연구결과표명:1991~2005년기간,유우북경、천진적본지자원능치대경제발전적구동력불족,성시발전대외부수입능치적의뢰정도월래월고;북경、천진、당산사회자계통적능치지표균정상승추세,성시거민생활수평화경제발전수평불단제고;북경경제자계통적각항지표균우우천진화당산,단배경자계통화능치가지속지표체현출,북경적배경압력최대、가지속발전능력저우천진화당산.재차분석기출상,대북경、천진、당산적가지속발전제출료궤점건의,위제정성시발전책략화산업조정제공과학의거.
Employing the emergy analytical method and taking Beijing, Tianjin and Tangshan of the "Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei" region as the research objects, this paper establishes the emergy indexes of complex ecosystem and sustainable development, and conducts the comparative analysis of natural environments and socioeconomic sustainable development in these three cities from the year 1991 to 2005.The results show that, from 1991 to 2005, since local resources emergy in Beijing and Tianjin has provided insufficient driving forces to regional economic development, urban development of these two cities has seen increasing independence on external resources; the emergy indexes of social subsystem in these three cities are on the rise, indicating the steadily improved both living standards for urban residents and economic development levels; and the indexes of economic development level in Beijing are superior to those of Tianjin and Tangshan, but the emergy indexes of environment subsystem and sustainable development suggest that Beijing has the heaviest environmental pressure among these three cities, and its sustainable development capacities are lower than those of Tianjin and Tangshan. Based on this analysis of the three cities, several proposals concerning the sustainable development of Beijing, Tianjin and Tangshan are put forward to provide scientific grounds for formulation of urban development strategies and industrial restructuring.