上海交通大学学报(医学版)
上海交通大學學報(醫學版)
상해교통대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCE)
2010年
4期
428-431
,共4页
姚洁洁%詹维伟%陈曼%周建桥%陈林%刘振华
姚潔潔%詹維偉%陳曼%週建橋%陳林%劉振華
요길길%첨유위%진만%주건교%진림%류진화
肾%缺血再灌注损伤%灰阶超声造影%定量分析%家兔
腎%缺血再灌註損傷%灰階超聲造影%定量分析%傢兔
신%결혈재관주손상%회계초성조영%정량분석%가토
renal%ischemia reperfusion injury%gray-scale contrast-enhanced ultrasonography%quantitative analysis%rabbit
目的 通过灰阶超声造影及其量化分析技术评价兔肾缺血后不同时间的再灌注损伤.方法 术前先对10只新西兰家兔行左肾超声造影检查作为对照(R_0组,n=10);再将10只家兔随机分为术后缺血30 min后再灌注30 min组(R_1组,n=5)和再灌注60 min组(R_2组,n=5),分别建立肾缺血再灌注模型.灰阶超声造影观察各组肾皮质灌注,并分析灌注峰值时间(TP)、灌注峰值强度(A)、Qontraxl时间-强度曲线(TIC)上升斜率(β)和曲线下面积(AUC).结果 随着再灌注损伤加重,超声造影显示肾皮质灌注回声无明显变化;TP和AUC呈增加趋势,β值逐渐降低,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或尸<0.01),其中AUC变化显著(P<0.01);A值无明显变化(P>0.05).结论 AUC是评价兔肾缺血再灌注损伤的有效指标.
目的 通過灰階超聲造影及其量化分析技術評價兔腎缺血後不同時間的再灌註損傷.方法 術前先對10隻新西蘭傢兔行左腎超聲造影檢查作為對照(R_0組,n=10);再將10隻傢兔隨機分為術後缺血30 min後再灌註30 min組(R_1組,n=5)和再灌註60 min組(R_2組,n=5),分彆建立腎缺血再灌註模型.灰階超聲造影觀察各組腎皮質灌註,併分析灌註峰值時間(TP)、灌註峰值彊度(A)、Qontraxl時間-彊度麯線(TIC)上升斜率(β)和麯線下麵積(AUC).結果 隨著再灌註損傷加重,超聲造影顯示腎皮質灌註迴聲無明顯變化;TP和AUC呈增加趨勢,β值逐漸降低,組間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05或尸<0.01),其中AUC變化顯著(P<0.01);A值無明顯變化(P>0.05).結論 AUC是評價兔腎缺血再灌註損傷的有效指標.
목적 통과회계초성조영급기양화분석기술평개토신결혈후불동시간적재관주손상.방법 술전선대10지신서란가토행좌신초성조영검사작위대조(R_0조,n=10);재장10지가토수궤분위술후결혈30 min후재관주30 min조(R_1조,n=5)화재관주60 min조(R_2조,n=5),분별건립신결혈재관주모형.회계초성조영관찰각조신피질관주,병분석관주봉치시간(TP)、관주봉치강도(A)、Qontraxl시간-강도곡선(TIC)상승사솔(β)화곡선하면적(AUC).결과 수착재관주손상가중,초성조영현시신피질관주회성무명현변화;TP화AUC정증가추세,β치축점강저,조간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05혹시<0.01),기중AUC변화현저(P<0.01);A치무명현변화(P>0.05).결론 AUC시평개토신결혈재관주손상적유효지표.
Objective To evaluate rabbit renal ischemia reperfusion injury ( IRI) by gray-scale contrast-enhanced ultrasonography ( CEUS) and quantitative analysis techniques. Methods Ten New Zealand rabbits were performed left renal ultrasonography before surgery and were served as controls ( R_0 group, n = 10), and then were randomly divided into R_1 group ( reperfusion for 30 min after ischemia for 30 min group, n = 5) and R_2 group ( reperfusion for 60 min after ischemia for 30 min group, n = 5) to establish the models of renal IRI. The pattern of renal perfusion was observed by CEUS, and time to peak (TP), amplitude of peak intensity( A), rising slope ( β) of Qontraxt time-intensity curve and area under the curve (AUC) were analysed. Results With the increase of reperfusion injury, there was no significant change in renal cortex echo revealed by CEUS. TP and AUC increased, β values decreased (P < 0. 05 or P < 0. 01), and the change of AUC was even more significant ( P < 0. 01). Besides, there was no significant change in A values among groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion AUC is an effective index for evaluating rabbit renal IRI.