国际护理学杂志
國際護理學雜誌
국제호이학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING
2010年
8期
1131-1133
,共3页
薄层液基细胞学%人乳头状瘤病毒%筛查%早防早治%健康教育
薄層液基細胞學%人乳頭狀瘤病毒%篩查%早防早治%健康教育
박층액기세포학%인유두상류병독%사사%조방조치%건강교육
Autocyte pap smear fluid -based system%Human papillomavirus%Screening%Early prevention and treatment%Health education
目的 了解门诊及体检人群宫颈液基细胞学(LCT)及人乳头状瘤病毒(HPV)检测结果异常的相关因素,探索健康教育、健康促进的方法.方法 随机选取在门诊及体检联合筛查的妇女各10 000例.采用一般资料调查表,妇科综合评定表进行相关因素调查,统计检测异常结果.结果 门诊病人LCT异常率为15.96%,HPV感染阳性率为29.07%,两者均异常1308例(13.08%);体检人群筛查LCT异常率为10.9%,HPV感染阳性率为13%,两者均异常916例(9.16%);两类人群检测异常结果比较有统计学意义(P＜0.05).性生活开始年龄早,多个性伴侣或性伴侣有多个性伴侣,多孕多产,社会经济地位低下,各种微生物感染等易感因素在门诊人群的体现明显高于体检人群(P均＜0.01).结论 门诊病人中,与宫颈癌发生相关的高危因素人群明显高于体检人群,提示门诊医护人员应根据门诊不同人群采取针对性的健康教育,更早的预防和发现宫颈癌前病变,以达到预防和消除HPV感染,做到真正意义上的宫颈癌早防早治教育.
目的 瞭解門診及體檢人群宮頸液基細胞學(LCT)及人乳頭狀瘤病毒(HPV)檢測結果異常的相關因素,探索健康教育、健康促進的方法.方法 隨機選取在門診及體檢聯閤篩查的婦女各10 000例.採用一般資料調查錶,婦科綜閤評定錶進行相關因素調查,統計檢測異常結果.結果 門診病人LCT異常率為15.96%,HPV感染暘性率為29.07%,兩者均異常1308例(13.08%);體檢人群篩查LCT異常率為10.9%,HPV感染暘性率為13%,兩者均異常916例(9.16%);兩類人群檢測異常結果比較有統計學意義(P＜0.05).性生活開始年齡早,多箇性伴侶或性伴侶有多箇性伴侶,多孕多產,社會經濟地位低下,各種微生物感染等易感因素在門診人群的體現明顯高于體檢人群(P均＜0.01).結論 門診病人中,與宮頸癌髮生相關的高危因素人群明顯高于體檢人群,提示門診醫護人員應根據門診不同人群採取針對性的健康教育,更早的預防和髮現宮頸癌前病變,以達到預防和消除HPV感染,做到真正意義上的宮頸癌早防早治教育.
목적 료해문진급체검인군궁경액기세포학(LCT)급인유두상류병독(HPV)검측결과이상적상관인소,탐색건강교육、건강촉진적방법.방법 수궤선취재문진급체검연합사사적부녀각10 000례.채용일반자료조사표,부과종합평정표진행상관인소조사,통계검측이상결과.결과 문진병인LCT이상솔위15.96%,HPV감염양성솔위29.07%,량자균이상1308례(13.08%);체검인군사사LCT이상솔위10.9%,HPV감염양성솔위13%,량자균이상916례(9.16%);량류인군검측이상결과비교유통계학의의(P＜0.05).성생활개시년령조,다개성반려혹성반려유다개성반려,다잉다산,사회경제지위저하,각충미생물감염등역감인소재문진인군적체현명현고우체검인군(P균＜0.01).결론 문진병인중,여궁경암발생상관적고위인소인군명현고우체검인군,제시문진의호인원응근거문진불동인군채취침대성적건강교육,경조적예방화발현궁경암전병변,이체도예방화소제HPV감염,주도진정의의상적궁경암조방조치교육.
Objective To study the related factors on the abnormal results of LCT combined with HPV test on the out -patients and physical examination crowd. Methods The out -patients and medical examination combined screening women 10000 cases were randomly selected. General information on the questionnaire, gynecological comprehensive assessment tables related factors were investigated. Results Out -patients opportunistic screening: (LCT) exception was 15. 9%, HPV infection -positive rate was 29%, both exception 1 308 patients ( 13.08% ); personsreceived screening: (LCT) exception rate was 10. 9%, HPV infection -positive rate was 13%, both exception 916 patients (9. 16% ); the two types of people had abnormal results compared statistically (P ＜0. 05). Sex age early, multiple personality partner or partner had multiple personality partner, many pregnant prolific, socio-economic status, a variety of microbial infection etc predisposing factors in outpatient populations reflect were significantly higher than those in the physical examination population. Conclusions Cervical cancer -related risk factors for out -patients population are significantly higher than those in the physical examination crowd. The health care workers should adopt different health education basis on different out -patient crowd, preventing and discovering cervical precancerous lesions, to achieve the prevention and elimination of HPV infection, earlier finding, earlier treatment.
