CAJ | 학술논문

青少年科技创新大赛、＂明天小小科学家＂奖励活动是中国最具影响力的两个青少年科技赛事,英特尔国际科学与工程学大赛、美国科学人才选拔赛是美国的两大知名赛事。本研究从竞赛阶段类型、筛选形式、评审环节和评审标准4个角度,对以上竞赛的筛选机制进行了深入比较,并在此基础上提出如下建议：（1）简化竞赛的评审环节,提高综合素质考察环节的有效性;（2）细化评审标准,扩展评审维度,科学设定各维度权重;（3）扩大省赛评委的选择范围,实现各省评委的共享;（4）加强省赛评委的培训。
청소년과기창신대새、＂명천소소과학가＂장려활동시중국최구영향력적량개청소년과기새사,영특이국제과학여공정학대새、미국과학인재선발새시미국적량대지명새사。본연구종경새계단류형、사선형식、평심배절화평심표준4개각도,대이상경새적사선궤제진행료심입비교,병재차기출상제출여하건의：（1）간화경새적평심배절,제고종합소질고찰배절적유효성;（2）세화평심표준,확전평심유도,과학설정각유도권중;（3）확대성새평위적선택범위,실현각성평위적공향;（4）가강성새평위적배훈。
CASTIC and APFS are two youth science and technology competitions of great importance in China. ISEF and STS ale. two important competitions in America. This paper makes a Sino-US comparative study of the screening mechanism. On the basis of the study, some suggestions have been put forward. （1） To simplify the assessment part of our competitions and improve the effectiveness of the overall quality assessment. （2） To refine evaluation criteria, extend assessment dimensions and set the dimensions＇ weights with the scientific method. （3） To expand the provincial assessor scope of CASTIC and share provincial assessors as soon as possible. （4） To strengthen the provincial assessor training to ensure the orderly and efficient conducting of assessment.