中国心理卫生杂志
中國心理衛生雜誌
중국심리위생잡지
CHINESE MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL
2010年
1期
51-54,68
,共5页
羊晓莹%陈红%高笑%陈瑞
羊曉瑩%陳紅%高笑%陳瑞
양효형%진홍%고소%진서
女性心理%身体意象%行为实验%社会比较%媒体%横断面研究
女性心理%身體意象%行為實驗%社會比較%媒體%橫斷麵研究
녀성심리%신체의상%행위실험%사회비교%매체%횡단면연구
female psychology%body image%behavior experiment%social comparison%mass media%cross-sectional study
目的:研究媒体对女大学生身体意象的影响,以及社会比较在其中的作用.方法:受试来自于两所大学.实验一的受试为高、低社会比较特质的女生各63人.其中,高社会比较特质的受试有31人在模特意象组,30人在产品意象组.低社会比较特质的受试有30人在模特意象组,32人在产品意象组.实验二的受试为高社会比较特质的女生61人,其中采用相似性社会比较的受试30人,采用差异性社会比较的受试31人.用身体意象状态量表、身体外貌比较问卷和顾客反应问卷进行测量.结果:方差分析显示,在模特意象水平下,高社会比较组的身体意象状态量表得分高于低社会比较组[(5.54±1.05)vs.(4.73±0.92),P<0.001].回归分析进一步证明,社会比较在媒体对女性身体意象的影响中起调节作用(ΔR~2= 0.035,P<0.01).不同的社会比较方式对女大学生身体意象的影响不同(F=4.41,P<0.05),差异性社会比较组的身体意象状态量表得分高于相似性社会比较组[(5.55±0.82)vs.(4.56±0.86)].结论:本研究提示可利用社会比较来预防女大学生的消极身体意象.
目的:研究媒體對女大學生身體意象的影響,以及社會比較在其中的作用.方法:受試來自于兩所大學.實驗一的受試為高、低社會比較特質的女生各63人.其中,高社會比較特質的受試有31人在模特意象組,30人在產品意象組.低社會比較特質的受試有30人在模特意象組,32人在產品意象組.實驗二的受試為高社會比較特質的女生61人,其中採用相似性社會比較的受試30人,採用差異性社會比較的受試31人.用身體意象狀態量錶、身體外貌比較問捲和顧客反應問捲進行測量.結果:方差分析顯示,在模特意象水平下,高社會比較組的身體意象狀態量錶得分高于低社會比較組[(5.54±1.05)vs.(4.73±0.92),P<0.001].迴歸分析進一步證明,社會比較在媒體對女性身體意象的影響中起調節作用(ΔR~2= 0.035,P<0.01).不同的社會比較方式對女大學生身體意象的影響不同(F=4.41,P<0.05),差異性社會比較組的身體意象狀態量錶得分高于相似性社會比較組[(5.55±0.82)vs.(4.56±0.86)].結論:本研究提示可利用社會比較來預防女大學生的消極身體意象.
목적:연구매체대녀대학생신체의상적영향,이급사회비교재기중적작용.방법:수시래자우량소대학.실험일적수시위고、저사회비교특질적녀생각63인.기중,고사회비교특질적수시유31인재모특의상조,30인재산품의상조.저사회비교특질적수시유30인재모특의상조,32인재산품의상조.실험이적수시위고사회비교특질적녀생61인,기중채용상사성사회비교적수시30인,채용차이성사회비교적수시31인.용신체의상상태량표、신체외모비교문권화고객반응문권진행측량.결과:방차분석현시,재모특의상수평하,고사회비교조적신체의상상태량표득분고우저사회비교조[(5.54±1.05)vs.(4.73±0.92),P<0.001].회귀분석진일보증명,사회비교재매체대녀성신체의상적영향중기조절작용(ΔR~2= 0.035,P<0.01).불동적사회비교방식대녀대학생신체의상적영향불동(F=4.41,P<0.05),차이성사회비교조적신체의상상태량표득분고우상사성사회비교조[(5.55±0.82)vs.(4.56±0.86)].결론:본연구제시가이용사회비교래예방녀대학생적소겁신체의상.
Objective:To research the effect of the media on women's body image.Methods:The subjects were all from 2 colleges.The subjects of experiment 1 were 63 high and low trait social comparison female students.Among them,high trait social comparison subjects were 31 in the model image group,30 in the product image group.Low trait social comparison subjects were 30 in the model image group,32 were in the product image group.The subjects of experiment 2 were the total of 61 high trait social comparison female students.Among them,30 subjects were analyzed by similarity comparison,and 31 subjects received difference comparison.The instruments included advertisement pictures,body image states scale,the physical apperance comparion scale,and the consumer response questionnaire.Results:Analysis of variance showed that,in the model image level,the score of body image scale in high social comparison group was significantly higher than that in low social comparison group [(5.54±1.05)vs.(4.73±0.92),P<0.001].Regression analysis further showed that social comparison was moderator(ΔR~2= 0.035,P<0.01).For social comparisons mode,score of body image scale in difference comparison group was higher than that in similarity comparison group [(5.55±0.82)vs.(4.56±0.86),P<0.05].Conclusion:These findings suggested that social comparison can be used to prevent female college students' negative body images.