哈尔滨医科大学学报
哈爾濱醫科大學學報
합이빈의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF HARBIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2010年
1期
91-93
,共3页
任丽虹%杨大平%宋甄%肖志波%刘莺%庞建华
任麗虹%楊大平%宋甄%肖誌波%劉鶯%龐建華
임려홍%양대평%송견%초지파%류앵%방건화
加热肿胀液%吸脂%手术风险
加熱腫脹液%吸脂%手術風險
가열종창액%흡지%수술풍험
heating infiltration solutions%liposuction%surgical risk
目的 研究在吸脂中使用室温肿胀液与体温肿胀液对生命体征的影响.方法 两个实验组各包括20例健康女性.A组注射的皮下肿胀液在室温水平(25℃),B组使用的肿胀液在体温水平(37℃).生命体征(心率,呼吸,体温,血压)每隔20min监测1次,直至达到正常生命体征.结果 A组、B组在心率、呼吸、血压上的差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05).而在术中20、40、60 min A组的体温(℃)(35.1±0.8、35.3±2.2、35.2±5.3)和B组的体温(35.9±1.1、36.2±3.5、36.3±2.6),两组比较P<0.05,差异有统计学意义.结论 在肿胀吸脂中使用加热的肿胀液可以保持稳定的生命体征,而且减少手术风险.
目的 研究在吸脂中使用室溫腫脹液與體溫腫脹液對生命體徵的影響.方法 兩箇實驗組各包括20例健康女性.A組註射的皮下腫脹液在室溫水平(25℃),B組使用的腫脹液在體溫水平(37℃).生命體徵(心率,呼吸,體溫,血壓)每隔20min鑑測1次,直至達到正常生命體徵.結果 A組、B組在心率、呼吸、血壓上的差異沒有統計學意義(P>0.05).而在術中20、40、60 min A組的體溫(℃)(35.1±0.8、35.3±2.2、35.2±5.3)和B組的體溫(35.9±1.1、36.2±3.5、36.3±2.6),兩組比較P<0.05,差異有統計學意義.結論 在腫脹吸脂中使用加熱的腫脹液可以保持穩定的生命體徵,而且減少手術風險.
목적 연구재흡지중사용실온종창액여체온종창액대생명체정적영향.방법 량개실험조각포괄20례건강녀성.A조주사적피하종창액재실온수평(25℃),B조사용적종창액재체온수평(37℃).생명체정(심솔,호흡,체온,혈압)매격20min감측1차,직지체도정상생명체정.결과 A조、B조재심솔、호흡、혈압상적차이몰유통계학의의(P>0.05).이재술중20、40、60 min A조적체온(℃)(35.1±0.8、35.3±2.2、35.2±5.3)화B조적체온(35.9±1.1、36.2±3.5、36.3±2.6),량조비교P<0.05,차이유통계학의의.결론 재종창흡지중사용가열적종창액가이보지은정적생명체정,이차감소수술풍험.
Objective To determine the effect of tumescent infiltration solutions at room temperature and at body temperature on vital signs in liposuction. Methods Two similar groups of 20 healthy female subjects were studied. In the first group (group A), subcutaneous solutions were infiltrated at room temperature(25 ℃), and in the second group (group B), solutions were infiltrated at body temperature(37 ℃).Vital signs(i.e. heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and blood pressure) were monitored every 20 minutes until the basal vital signs were attained. Results Although there were differences in heart rate, respiratory rate, and arterial pressure, they were not ststistically significant. Nevertheless, the differences (℃) between groups A (35.1±0.8,35.3±2.2,35.2±5.3)versus groups B(35.9±1.1,36.2±3.5,36.3±2.6℃)for body temperature were statistically significant in 20,40,60 minutes of intraoperation (P<0.05). Conclusion Heating subcutaneous infiltrating solutions used in tumescent liposuction provides greater stability of vital signs and lower surgical risk.