CAJ | 학술논문

文章主要针对中国古代语言和论证的一些重要方面进行探讨,特别地,我们重点考察了儒家和墨家的观点。我们主张使用轻型的逻辑模型方法（不引进全部的现代逻辑演算）对一些重要的概念提供解释。我们所关注的问题主要有：情景辨别和做出反应、根据合适的反应来正名、以及通过＂法＂和＂因＂两个方面讨论类的外延。我们尝试使用博弈模型来表示古代论证的实际情形,重点讨论关于对象和类之间关系的争辩。在文章的最后,我们讨论了使用博弈建模方法对于理解古代中国推理实践潜在的可能性。
문장주요침대중국고대어언화론증적일사중요방면진행탐토,특별지,아문중점고찰료유가화묵가적관점。아문주장사용경형적라집모형방법（불인진전부적현대라집연산）대일사중요적개념제공해석。아문소관주적문제주요유：정경변별화주출반응、근거합괄적반응래정명、이급통과＂법＂화＂인＂량개방면토론류적외연。아문상시사용박혁모형래표시고대론증적실제정형,중점토론관우대상화류지간관계적쟁변。재문장적최후,아문토론료사용박혁건모방법대우리해고대중국추리실천잠재적가능성。
In this paper we take a look at some key aspects of ancient Chinese views on language and argumentation, particularly those of the Confucians and the Mohists. We advocate the use of lightweight logical models of some key concepts, without importing the full ma-chinery of modern logical calculi. Our topics include： discrimination and response, correctnaming in terms of appropriate responses, and the extension of kinds via standards and criteria.We also make a first attempt at representing the practice of ancient argumentation using games for disputes about categorisation of objects in a Mohist spirit. We end by discussing the wider potential of game modeling for understanding the reasoning practices of ancient China.