中国实用眼科杂志
中國實用眼科雜誌
중국실용안과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
2011年
7期
692-694
,共3页
李炳震%彭荣梅%任婧%刘峰%吴玲玲%洪晶
李炳震%彭榮梅%任婧%劉峰%吳玲玲%洪晶
리병진%팽영매%임청%류봉%오령령%홍정
角膜内皮移植%中央角膜厚度%超声角膜测厚仪%眼前节相干光断层扫描
角膜內皮移植%中央角膜厚度%超聲角膜測厚儀%眼前節相榦光斷層掃描
각막내피이식%중앙각막후도%초성각막측후의%안전절상간광단층소묘
Descemet's Stripping with Automated Endothelium Keratoplasty (DSAEK)%Central corneal thickness (CCT)%Ultrasonic pachymeter%Anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT)
目的 比较角膜内皮移植(DSAEK)术后后眼前节相干光断层扫描(AS-OCT)与超声角膜测厚仪测量的中央角膜厚度(CCT),评估两种方法的一致性,为AS-OCT的临床应用提供客观依据.方法 分别应用AS-OCT与超声角膜测厚仪测量DSAEK后患者38例(41只眼)的CCT,对两种方法所得的测量值进行配对t检验及Pearson相关分析,并采用Bland-Altman plot进行一致性评价.结果 AS-OCT与超声角膜测厚仪测量CCT的平均值分别为(728.73±138.39)μm和(718.56±131.37)μm;两组数据差异无统计学意义(t=-1.170;P=0.249).通过Pearson相关性分析,这两种方法的测量值成正相关(r=0.916,P <0.01).AS-OCT与超声角膜测厚测量值的一致性较好.结论 DSAEK后,AS-OCT与超声角膜测厚两种测量方法的一致性较好,但由于前者所具备的独特优势,AS-OCT可以作为DSAEK后长期随访角膜厚度变化的一种有效的检测工具.
目的 比較角膜內皮移植(DSAEK)術後後眼前節相榦光斷層掃描(AS-OCT)與超聲角膜測厚儀測量的中央角膜厚度(CCT),評估兩種方法的一緻性,為AS-OCT的臨床應用提供客觀依據.方法 分彆應用AS-OCT與超聲角膜測厚儀測量DSAEK後患者38例(41隻眼)的CCT,對兩種方法所得的測量值進行配對t檢驗及Pearson相關分析,併採用Bland-Altman plot進行一緻性評價.結果 AS-OCT與超聲角膜測厚儀測量CCT的平均值分彆為(728.73±138.39)μm和(718.56±131.37)μm;兩組數據差異無統計學意義(t=-1.170;P=0.249).通過Pearson相關性分析,這兩種方法的測量值成正相關(r=0.916,P <0.01).AS-OCT與超聲角膜測厚測量值的一緻性較好.結論 DSAEK後,AS-OCT與超聲角膜測厚兩種測量方法的一緻性較好,但由于前者所具備的獨特優勢,AS-OCT可以作為DSAEK後長期隨訪角膜厚度變化的一種有效的檢測工具.
목적 비교각막내피이식(DSAEK)술후후안전절상간광단층소묘(AS-OCT)여초성각막측후의측량적중앙각막후도(CCT),평고량충방법적일치성,위AS-OCT적림상응용제공객관의거.방법 분별응용AS-OCT여초성각막측후의측량DSAEK후환자38례(41지안)적CCT,대량충방법소득적측량치진행배대t검험급Pearson상관분석,병채용Bland-Altman plot진행일치성평개.결과 AS-OCT여초성각막측후의측량CCT적평균치분별위(728.73±138.39)μm화(718.56±131.37)μm;량조수거차이무통계학의의(t=-1.170;P=0.249).통과Pearson상관성분석,저량충방법적측량치성정상관(r=0.916,P <0.01).AS-OCT여초성각막측후측량치적일치성교호.결론 DSAEK후,AS-OCT여초성각막측후량충측량방법적일치성교호,단유우전자소구비적독특우세,AS-OCT가이작위DSAEK후장기수방각막후도변화적일충유효적검측공구.
Objective To assess the agreement of central corneal thickness ( CCT) measured by anterior segment-optical tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasonic pachymeter after Descemet's Stripping with Automated Endothelium Keratoplasty (DSAEK) and provide objective basis for clinical application of AS-OCT. Methods Forty-one eyes of 38 patients after Descemet's Stripping with Automated Endothelium Keratoplasty (DSAEK) underwent CCT measurement by AS-OCT and ultrasonic pachymeter.The data was analyzed by paired-t test and Pearson correlation analysis. Bland-Altman plot was used to assess the agreement.Results The mean CCT values were(728.73±1 38.39)μ m measured by AS-OCT and (718.56+131.37)μ m measured by ultrasonic pachymeter,and there was no significant difference between the two methods. Regression analysis showed a high correlation between the values obtained by both devices (r =0.916, P<0.01). AS-OCT and ultrasonic pachymeter showed a less a-greernent in CCT measurement after DSAEK. Conclusions After DSAEK, there is a reasonable agreement between two techniques, AS-OCT and ultrasonic pachymeter of CCT measurements. Considering the special advantages, AS-OCT is an effective method to observe the changes of the corneal thickness in the long term.