中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2010年
2期
152-154
,共3页
军人护士%非现役文职护士%压力源%应对方式
軍人護士%非現役文職護士%壓力源%應對方式
군인호사%비현역문직호사%압력원%응대방식
Army nurse%Non-active civil servant nurse%Stressor%Coping style
目的 调查手术室军人护士和非现役文职护士工作压力源和应对方式,分析其影响因素.方法 采用工作压力源量表、简易应对方式量表,对40名军人及非现役文职护士进行问卷调查.结果 军人和非现役文职护士压力水平总分分别为(2.43±0.62),(2.58±0.67)分,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);军人护士在专业及社会地位上压力得分、工作量压力得分、工作环境和资源方面压力得分分别为(2.33±0.57),(2.51±0.79),(2.42±0.85)分,与非现役文职护士比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);军人及对压力源所采用的应对方式得分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 手术室军人及非现役文职护士工作压力源不同,护理管理者要采取有针对性的减压措施.
目的 調查手術室軍人護士和非現役文職護士工作壓力源和應對方式,分析其影響因素.方法 採用工作壓力源量錶、簡易應對方式量錶,對40名軍人及非現役文職護士進行問捲調查.結果 軍人和非現役文職護士壓力水平總分分彆為(2.43±0.62),(2.58±0.67)分,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);軍人護士在專業及社會地位上壓力得分、工作量壓力得分、工作環境和資源方麵壓力得分分彆為(2.33±0.57),(2.51±0.79),(2.42±0.85)分,與非現役文職護士比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);軍人及對壓力源所採用的應對方式得分差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 手術室軍人及非現役文職護士工作壓力源不同,護理管理者要採取有針對性的減壓措施.
목적 조사수술실군인호사화비현역문직호사공작압력원화응대방식,분석기영향인소.방법 채용공작압력원량표、간역응대방식량표,대40명군인급비현역문직호사진행문권조사.결과 군인화비현역문직호사압력수평총분분별위(2.43±0.62),(2.58±0.67)분,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);군인호사재전업급사회지위상압력득분、공작량압력득분、공작배경화자원방면압력득분분별위(2.33±0.57),(2.51±0.79),(2.42±0.85)분,여비현역문직호사비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);군인급대압력원소채용적응대방식득분차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 수술실군인급비현역문직호사공작압력원불동,호리관리자요채취유침대성적감압조시.
Objective To investigate and analyze the job stressors and coping styles among army and non-active civil servant nurses. Methods Forty nurses were recruited and investigated with Job Stressor Scale and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire. Results There was significant difference in the professional development, workload and working environment(P <0. 01). There was no significant difference in the score of coping styles(P > 0. 05). Conclusions There are different job stressors among army and non-active civil servant nurses. Nursing administrators should take corresponding measures to relieve nurses' job stress.
