中华肿瘤杂志
中華腫瘤雜誌
중화종류잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
2009年
5期
371-374
,共4页
宋武%何裕隆%张常华%蔡世荣%周学付%彭建军%詹文华
宋武%何裕隆%張常華%蔡世榮%週學付%彭建軍%詹文華
송무%하유륭%장상화%채세영%주학부%팽건군%첨문화
内窥镜超声检查%螺旋CT%PET-CT%胃肿瘤%胰腺%肿瘤浸润
內窺鏡超聲檢查%螺鏇CT%PET-CT%胃腫瘤%胰腺%腫瘤浸潤
내규경초성검사%라선CT%PET-CT%위종류%이선%종류침윤
Endoscopic uhrasonography%Spiral CT%PET-CT%Stomach neoplasms%Pancreas,tumor invasion
目的 评估在螺旋CT筛选出胃癌侵犯胰腺病例的基础上,联合应用超声内镜(EUS)和PET-CT检查对胃癌侵犯胰腺的术前诊断价值.方法 前瞻性选取60例术前螺旋CT检查诊断为胃癌侵犯胰腺的患者,联合EUS检查(60例)和PET-CT检查(14例),判断是否存在胃癌侵犯胰腺,并与手术探查和术后病理结果 进行对照.结果 手术探查和术后病理结果 显示,60例患者中,38例存在胰腺侵犯,22例无胰腺侵犯.CT在胃癌侵犯胰腺方面诊断的准确率为63.3%,过度诊断率为36.7%.在CT诊断的基础上,结合EUS检查诊断胃癌侵犯胰腺的准确率达到87.8%,过度诊断率为7.3%,与单纯使用螺旋CT检查相比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);与PET-CT检查相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).螺旋CT和EUS检查在诊断胃癌侵犯胰腺位置、侵犯胰腺程度等方面比PET-CT检查更有优势(P<0.01).结论 术前应用螺旋CT诊断胃癌侵犯胰腺的准确率尚有待提高;在螺旋CT检查的基础上联合应用EUS可提高术前诊断的准确率;螺旋CT和EUS检查在诊断胃癌侵犯胰腺位置、侵犯胰腺程度等方面可提供比PET-CT更多的信息.
目的 評估在螺鏇CT篩選齣胃癌侵犯胰腺病例的基礎上,聯閤應用超聲內鏡(EUS)和PET-CT檢查對胃癌侵犯胰腺的術前診斷價值.方法 前瞻性選取60例術前螺鏇CT檢查診斷為胃癌侵犯胰腺的患者,聯閤EUS檢查(60例)和PET-CT檢查(14例),判斷是否存在胃癌侵犯胰腺,併與手術探查和術後病理結果 進行對照.結果 手術探查和術後病理結果 顯示,60例患者中,38例存在胰腺侵犯,22例無胰腺侵犯.CT在胃癌侵犯胰腺方麵診斷的準確率為63.3%,過度診斷率為36.7%.在CT診斷的基礎上,結閤EUS檢查診斷胃癌侵犯胰腺的準確率達到87.8%,過度診斷率為7.3%,與單純使用螺鏇CT檢查相比,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.01);與PET-CT檢查相比,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).螺鏇CT和EUS檢查在診斷胃癌侵犯胰腺位置、侵犯胰腺程度等方麵比PET-CT檢查更有優勢(P<0.01).結論 術前應用螺鏇CT診斷胃癌侵犯胰腺的準確率尚有待提高;在螺鏇CT檢查的基礎上聯閤應用EUS可提高術前診斷的準確率;螺鏇CT和EUS檢查在診斷胃癌侵犯胰腺位置、侵犯胰腺程度等方麵可提供比PET-CT更多的信息.
목적 평고재라선CT사선출위암침범이선병례적기출상,연합응용초성내경(EUS)화PET-CT검사대위암침범이선적술전진단개치.방법 전첨성선취60례술전라선CT검사진단위위암침범이선적환자,연합EUS검사(60례)화PET-CT검사(14례),판단시부존재위암침범이선,병여수술탐사화술후병리결과 진행대조.결과 수술탐사화술후병리결과 현시,60례환자중,38례존재이선침범,22례무이선침범.CT재위암침범이선방면진단적준학솔위63.3%,과도진단솔위36.7%.재CT진단적기출상,결합EUS검사진단위암침범이선적준학솔체도87.8%,과도진단솔위7.3%,여단순사용라선CT검사상비,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.01);여PET-CT검사상비,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).라선CT화EUS검사재진단위암침범이선위치、침범이선정도등방면비PET-CT검사경유우세(P<0.01).결론 술전응용라선CT진단위암침범이선적준학솔상유대제고;재라선CT검사적기출상연합응용EUS가제고술전진단적준학솔;라선CT화EUS검사재진단위암침범이선위치、침범이선정도등방면가제공비PET-CT경다적신식.
Objective To evaluate the value of EUS and PET-CT in combination with spiral CT in preoperative assessment of gastric cancer invasion to the pancreas. Methods Sixty advanced gastric cancer patients with suspected pancreatic invasion detected by spiral CT were selected in this study. All the 60 cases were then examined by EUS and 14 of them by PET-CT. The results were compared and evaluated with the findings during surgical operation and pathological results. Results The rate of correct preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic invasion by spiral CT in advanced gastric cancer patients was 63.3%, with an overdiagnosis rate of 36.7%. The diagnostic accuracy was increased to 87.8% and overdiagnosis reduced to 7.3%, when combined with EUS. There was a significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between spirl CT alone and spiral CT combined with EUS(P <0.01), but no significant difference between spirl CT alone and spiral CT combined with PET-CT (P > 0.05). Spiral CT-EUS was more valuable in assessment of tumor location and invasion than PET-CT (P < 0.01). Conclusion The accuracy of spiral CT alone in the preoperative assessment of advanced gastric cancer with invasion to the pancreas is not high enough yet at present. Spiral CT combined with EUS can provide more accurate imformation on the tumor location, invasion site and extent of gastric cancer invasion to the pancreas, and reduce the overstaging rate caused by spiral CT alone. However, spiral CT combined with PET-CT does not show such improvement significantly.