振动与冲击
振動與遲擊
진동여충격
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND SHOCK
2009年
7期
143-146,174
,共5页
许福友%谭岩斌%张哲%陈国芳
許福友%譚巖斌%張哲%陳國芳
허복우%담암빈%장철%진국방
人行景观桥%风洞试验%抖振%峰值因子
人行景觀橋%風洞試驗%抖振%峰值因子
인행경관교%풍동시험%두진%봉치인자
landscape footbridge%wind tunnel test%buffeting%peak factor
通过全桥气弹模型试验对宿迁黄河公园景观桥在均匀流场和紊流场、3种风攻角条件下的风振响应性能进行了研究;对风速高度变化修正系数的理论计算值与规范值作了对比,分析其偏差原因.研究结果表明:地表越粗糙、高度越低,修正系数差值越大;40 m高度以上两种结果非常吻合;黄河公园景观桥在三种攻角条件下,都未发现明显的涡激振动,且满足气动稳定要求;即使高风速条件下,抖振位移标准差也有可能高于平均值;均匀和紊流场中位移峰值因子及其比值分别主要分布在区间[2.5,4]和[0.8,1.2]内;峰值因子与风场、风速、攻角之间基本不存在明确对应关系;研究结果可对风振理论分析中峰值因子的合理取值提供很好参考.
通過全橋氣彈模型試驗對宿遷黃河公園景觀橋在均勻流場和紊流場、3種風攻角條件下的風振響應性能進行瞭研究;對風速高度變化脩正繫數的理論計算值與規範值作瞭對比,分析其偏差原因.研究結果錶明:地錶越粗糙、高度越低,脩正繫數差值越大;40 m高度以上兩種結果非常吻閤;黃河公園景觀橋在三種攻角條件下,都未髮現明顯的渦激振動,且滿足氣動穩定要求;即使高風速條件下,抖振位移標準差也有可能高于平均值;均勻和紊流場中位移峰值因子及其比值分彆主要分佈在區間[2.5,4]和[0.8,1.2]內;峰值因子與風場、風速、攻角之間基本不存在明確對應關繫;研究結果可對風振理論分析中峰值因子的閤理取值提供很好參攷.
통과전교기탄모형시험대숙천황하공완경관교재균균류장화문류장、3충풍공각조건하적풍진향응성능진행료연구;대풍속고도변화수정계수적이론계산치여규범치작료대비,분석기편차원인.연구결과표명:지표월조조、고도월저,수정계수차치월대;40 m고도이상량충결과비상문합;황하공완경관교재삼충공각조건하,도미발현명현적와격진동,차만족기동은정요구;즉사고풍속조건하,두진위이표준차야유가능고우평균치;균균화문류장중위이봉치인자급기비치분별주요분포재구간[2.5,4]화[0.8,1.2]내;봉치인자여풍장、풍속、공각지간기본불존재명학대응관계;연구결과가대풍진이론분석중봉치인자적합리취치제공흔호삼고.
The wind response performance of Huanghe Park landscape footbridge in Suqian city was investigated via a full bridge aeroelastic model test in smooth and turbulent flows with 3 types attack angles. The theoretical values of the wind velocity modification factor due to height varying were compared with those offered in specification, and the discrep- ancy reasons were analyzed. The results revealed that the much rougher the ground surface and the lower the height, the larger the differences between two kinds of the modification factor. The two kinds of the factor values agreed well if the height was larger than 40m. For Huanghe Park landscape footbridge, with 3 kinds of attack angles, no obvious vortex vi- bration could be observed, and the aerodynamic stability satisfied the requirements. The buffeting displacement standard deviation might be higher than the mean value, even for higher wind velocity. The displacement peak factors and their ra- tios in smooth and turbulent flows distributed in the intervals of [2.5,4] and [0.8, 1.2]. No explicit relations existed between peak factors and wind flows, wind velocities and wind attack angles. The investigations could offer valuable refer- ence for rational determination of peak value in wind vibration theoretical analysis.