中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2008年
41期
2912-2915
,共4页
刘效巍%许晶%张炳蔚%赵仑%李青栋%姜国晶
劉效巍%許晶%張炳蔚%趙崙%李青棟%薑國晶
류효외%허정%장병위%조륜%리청동%강국정
惊恐发作%抑制%事件相关电位
驚恐髮作%抑製%事件相關電位
량공발작%억제%사건상관전위
Panic disorder%Inhibit%Event-related potential
目的 探讨惊恐障碍患者抑制性控制缺陷的神经电生理机制.方法 采用视觉事件相关电位Go/Nogo实验方式,对16例惊恐障碍患者(PD)和13名健康对照(NC)进行研究.任务为随机出现的等概率双英文字母和单英文字母,要求被试者对双英文字母进行按键反应(Go),单英文字母不按键(Nogo),记录行为学数据和32导脑电数据.结果 惊恐障碍患者和止常对照组均产生了明显的额中央区Nogo-N2(PD组:F1,30=8.00,P=0.08;NC组:F1,24=4.60,P=0.042)和Nogo-P3效应(PD组:F1,30=7.85,P=0.09;NC组:F1,24=13.57,P=0.000),但是惊恐障碍患者的Nogo-N2和Nogo-P3波幅明显低于正常对照组(Fz:F=9.135,P=0.005;F=8.511,P=0.006),潜伏期差异无统计学意义.结论 惊恐障碍患者脑信息加工过程特定时间窗抑制性控制障碍,为进一步揭示惊恐障碍的发病机制提供了新的脑电生理证据.
目的 探討驚恐障礙患者抑製性控製缺陷的神經電生理機製.方法 採用視覺事件相關電位Go/Nogo實驗方式,對16例驚恐障礙患者(PD)和13名健康對照(NC)進行研究.任務為隨機齣現的等概率雙英文字母和單英文字母,要求被試者對雙英文字母進行按鍵反應(Go),單英文字母不按鍵(Nogo),記錄行為學數據和32導腦電數據.結果 驚恐障礙患者和止常對照組均產生瞭明顯的額中央區Nogo-N2(PD組:F1,30=8.00,P=0.08;NC組:F1,24=4.60,P=0.042)和Nogo-P3效應(PD組:F1,30=7.85,P=0.09;NC組:F1,24=13.57,P=0.000),但是驚恐障礙患者的Nogo-N2和Nogo-P3波幅明顯低于正常對照組(Fz:F=9.135,P=0.005;F=8.511,P=0.006),潛伏期差異無統計學意義.結論 驚恐障礙患者腦信息加工過程特定時間窗抑製性控製障礙,為進一步揭示驚恐障礙的髮病機製提供瞭新的腦電生理證據.
목적 탐토량공장애환자억제성공제결함적신경전생리궤제.방법 채용시각사건상관전위Go/Nogo실험방식,대16례량공장애환자(PD)화13명건강대조(NC)진행연구.임무위수궤출현적등개솔쌍영문자모화단영문자모,요구피시자대쌍영문자모진행안건반응(Go),단영문자모불안건(Nogo),기록행위학수거화32도뇌전수거.결과 량공장애환자화지상대조조균산생료명현적액중앙구Nogo-N2(PD조:F1,30=8.00,P=0.08;NC조:F1,24=4.60,P=0.042)화Nogo-P3효응(PD조:F1,30=7.85,P=0.09;NC조:F1,24=13.57,P=0.000),단시량공장애환자적Nogo-N2화Nogo-P3파폭명현저우정상대조조(Fz:F=9.135,P=0.005;F=8.511,P=0.006),잠복기차이무통계학의의.결론 량공장애환자뇌신식가공과정특정시간창억제성공제장애,위진일보게시량공장애적발병궤제제공료신적뇌전생리증거.
Objective To investigate the electrophysiological evidence of inhibitory control deficit in panic disorder patients using a visual simple Go/Nogo task. Methods Sixteen patients with panic disorder and 13 healthy volunteers received a visual simple Go/Nogo task. The stimuli were single or double English letters and appeared with equal probability. The subjects were instructed to press a button as quickly as possible when the double letter was presented (I. E. , GO), but make no response to the single letter (I. E. ,Nogo). 32 channel EEG data were recorded. Result All subjects displayed a distinct Go/Nogo effect in the N2 component (PD group: F1,30= 8.00, P = 0.008 ; NC group: F1,24 = 4.60, P = 0.042) and P3 component (PD group:F1,30 = 7.85,P =0.009; NC group:F1,24 = 13.57,P =0.000) at frontocentral sites, but the amplitudes of Nogo-N2 and Nogo-P3 were significantly reduced in panic disorder patients as compared to the healthy subjects (Fz: F = 9.135, P = 0.005 ; F = 8.511, P = 0.006, respectively). There was no significant differences between the latencies of Nogo-N2 and Nogo-P3. Conclusion Panic disorder may consist inhibitory control deficit which may assist in of fering new objective evidence to understand the etiology of panic disorder.