中华口腔医学研究杂志（电子版）
中華口腔醫學研究雜誌（電子版）
중화구강의학연구잡지（전자판）
CHINESE JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2009年
4期
430-434
,共5页
黏接型颊面管%京津釉质黏接剂%GCFuji正畸黏接剂%黏接
黏接型頰麵管%京津釉質黏接劑%GCFuji正畸黏接劑%黏接
점접형협면관%경진유질점접제%GCFuji정기점접제%점접
Directly bonded buccal tube%Enamel bonding resin%GC Fuji ortho bonding adhesive%Bond
目的 探讨GC Fuji正畸黏接剂和京津釉质黏接剂黏接磨牙颊面管的临床效果.方法 将 60 例患者随机分为两组,分别使用GC Fuji正畸黏接剂和京津釉质黏接剂进行黏接型磨牙颊面管的黏接,对其临床治疗过程中颊面管的脱落率及脱落后牙釉质上的黏接材料残留指数进行观察分析.结果 GC Fuji正畸黏接剂组的颊面管脱落率略低于京津釉质黏接剂组,但差异无统计学意义(P ＞ 0.05).两种黏接剂黏接后均显示,上颌第一恒磨牙上的颊面管脱落率最低,而上颌第二恒磨牙的颊面管脱落率最高;两组颊面管脱落后黏接材料牙面残留指数均多数为 3,分别占总体分布的 55.0% 和 59.1%.结论 黏接黏接型颊面管时使用GC Fuji正畸黏接剂和京津釉质黏接剂的黏接效果差别不大;两组颊面管脱落时断裂界面均多数在牙釉质与黏接材料之间.
目的 探討GC Fuji正畸黏接劑和京津釉質黏接劑黏接磨牙頰麵管的臨床效果.方法 將 60 例患者隨機分為兩組,分彆使用GC Fuji正畸黏接劑和京津釉質黏接劑進行黏接型磨牙頰麵管的黏接,對其臨床治療過程中頰麵管的脫落率及脫落後牙釉質上的黏接材料殘留指數進行觀察分析.結果 GC Fuji正畸黏接劑組的頰麵管脫落率略低于京津釉質黏接劑組,但差異無統計學意義(P ＞ 0.05).兩種黏接劑黏接後均顯示,上頜第一恆磨牙上的頰麵管脫落率最低,而上頜第二恆磨牙的頰麵管脫落率最高;兩組頰麵管脫落後黏接材料牙麵殘留指數均多數為 3,分彆佔總體分佈的 55.0% 和 59.1%.結論 黏接黏接型頰麵管時使用GC Fuji正畸黏接劑和京津釉質黏接劑的黏接效果差彆不大;兩組頰麵管脫落時斷裂界麵均多數在牙釉質與黏接材料之間.
목적 탐토GC Fuji정기점접제화경진유질점접제점접마아협면관적림상효과.방법 장 60 례환자수궤분위량조,분별사용GC Fuji정기점접제화경진유질점접제진행점접형마아협면관적점접,대기림상치료과정중협면관적탈락솔급탈락후아유질상적점접재료잔류지수진행관찰분석.결과 GC Fuji정기점접제조적협면관탈락솔략저우경진유질점접제조,단차이무통계학의의(P ＞ 0.05).량충점접제점접후균현시,상합제일항마아상적협면관탈락솔최저,이상합제이항마아적협면관탈락솔최고;량조협면관탈락후점접재료아면잔류지수균다수위 3,분별점총체분포적 55.0% 화 59.1%.결론 점접점접형협면관시사용GC Fuji정기점접제화경진유질점접제적점접효과차별불대;량조협면관탈락시단렬계면균다수재아유질여점접재료지간.
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of two kinds of orthodontic cement in the bonding of directly bonded buccal tube. Methods 60 cases were divided into two groups randomly, and directly bonded buccal tubes were bonded seperately with GC Fuji ortho bonding adhesive (A) and enamel bonding resin (B). The bonding failure rate and the adhesive remnant index were calculated. Results The bonding failure rates of the two groups were A ＜ B, however had no significant difference (χ2＝2.772,P ＞ 0.05). The bonding failure rate in the upper first molar was the lowest and that of the upper second molar was the highest in both of the two groups. Most of the adhesive remnant index in both group are 3. Conclusions The adhesive effect of GC Fuji ORTHO and enamel bonding resin has no significant difference in bonding directly bonded buccal tube. The fractures of the debondings in both groups were mainly between the enamel and the cement.
