CAJ | 학술논문

阿列克西的宪法权利适用和解释理论是一种原则理论。这种理论将宪法权利规范看作是原则，也即要求某事在给定的法律和实际的可能性中在最大程度上被实现的规范。但在具体的宪法权利案件中会出现原则之间互相对抗的情况，因此就需要对欲确定适用的原则进行选择和权衡，而宪法权利适用的比例原则就是一个较好的解决方案。该原则理论和比例原则所具有的高度创见性在引起强烈反响的同时，也遭受了西方学术界的广泛批评，其中最基本和最重要的反对意见认为比例权衡是非理性的。在回应这些批评时，阿列克西提出，可以将比例权衡看作是商谈的理性结构，并据此证明比例权衡是理性的，故而可以实现商谈结果的理性的最大化。
아렬극서적헌법권리괄용화해석이론시일충원칙이론。저충이론장헌법권리규범간작시원칙，야즉요구모사재급정적법률화실제적가능성중재최대정도상피실현적규범。단재구체적헌법권리안건중회출현원칙지간호상대항적정황，인차취수요대욕학정괄용적원칙진행선택화권형，이헌법권리괄용적비례원칙취시일개교호적해결방안。해원칙이론화비례원칙소구유적고도창견성재인기강렬반향적동시，야조수료서방학술계적엄범비평，기중최기본화최중요적반대의견인위비례권형시비이성적。재회응저사비평시，아렬극서제출，가이장비례권형간작시상담적이성결구，병거차증명비례권형시이성적，고이가이실현상담결과적이성적최대화。
Being a kind of theory of principles, Alexy＇ s theory of application and interpretation of constitutional rights regards the norm of constitutional rights as the principle, namely, the norm requiring that something be realized to the greatest extent within the given legal and factual possibilities. In cases involving constitutional rights, however, principles may conflict with each other. Choice and balance, therefore, are needed in relation to the principle that shall be applied. In this regard, the principle of with the competing principles. Though proportionality has attracted much atte proportionality can be used as a relatively better way to deal the creativity of the theory of principles and the principle of ntion, it has also been criticized by western academic community widely. The most fundamental and important criticism has pointed out the irrationality of the balance of proportionality. In responding to these criticisms, Alexy explains that one may regard the balance of proportionality as a rational structure of discourse and by relying on this understanding, Alexy is able to expound and prove the rationality of the balance of proportionality. The rationality of the result of discourse may be realized to the maximum accordingly.