汉语普通话单音节测听表的多中心复测信度研究
한어보통화단음절측은표적다중심복측신도연구
Test-retest reliability of Mandarin monosyllable lists:a multi-center study in Chinese dialectal regions
  • 万方数据
    中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 중화이비인후두경외과잡지
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
    2010年 3期 200-205 ,共6页

    冀飞%郗昕%韩东一%林少莲%叶胜难%林有辉%崔勇%黄斯敏%赵乌兰%杨彦来%王永华%蒋政%李演轶%陈耿%刘秀丽%孙月华%王路阳%曹永茂%李骏%常伟%李蕴%任燕%吴皓

    기비%치흔%한동일%림소련%협성난%림유휘%최용%황사민%조오란%양언래%왕영화%장정%리연질%진경%류수려%손월화%왕로양%조영무%리준%상위%리온%임연%오호

    测听法%言语%单音节%汉语%可重复性%结果 測聽法%言語%單音節%漢語%可重複性%結果
    측은법%언어%단음절%한어%가중복성%결과
    Audiometry,speech%Mandarin,monosyllable%Reproducibility of results
    目的 研究自行开发的汉语普通话单音节测听表在不同方言区听力正常人群中的复测信度.方法 选择北方方言、吴越、闽北、闽南、粤、鄂等6个典型的方言区,确定大连、上海、杭州、武汉、广州、福州、厦门等7个城市作为测试中心.每个测试中心分别招募22名听力言语正常受试者.以均衡排序的方式测试每位受试者全部22张字表在言语听力级7 dB下的单音节识别率,间隔10 d至1个月后在完全相同的条件下重复进行第二轮测试.结果 相关分析显示前后两次单音节识别测试得分之间存在较密切的线性相关关系(r=0.682,P<0.01).配对student-t检验表明初测得分与复测得分之间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),总体复测平均得分(68.5%)高于初测平均得分(65.8%)2.7%,得分差值的标准差为10.1%.本测试材料在7个中心的总体95%可信区间临界差值为19.8%,相当于5个测试项.单因素方差分析显示总体的两次得分差值具有统计学意义(P<0.01).7家中心总体的得分差值与两次测试的时间间隔之间无相关关系(P=0.947).结论 测试变异度在各方言测试中心之间存在差异.汉语单音节识别材料受记忆效应的影响小.Pearson相关系数r不适用于测听材料复测信度的评估.
    목적 연구자행개발적한어보통화단음절측은표재불동방언구은력정상인군중적복측신도.방법 선택북방방언、오월、민북、민남、월、악등6개전형적방언구,학정대련、상해、항주、무한、엄주、복주、하문등7개성시작위측시중심.매개측시중심분별초모22명은력언어정상수시자.이균형배서적방식측시매위수시자전부22장자표재언어은력급7 dB하적단음절식별솔,간격10 d지1개월후재완전상동적조건하중복진행제이륜측시.결과 상관분석현시전후량차단음절식별측시득분지간존재교밀절적선성상관관계(r=0.682,P<0.01).배대student-t검험표명초측득분여복측득분지간차이구유통계학의의(P<0.01),총체복측평균득분(68.5%)고우초측평균득분(65.8%)2.7%,득분차치적표준차위10.1%.본측시재료재7개중심적총체95%가신구간림계차치위19.8%,상당우5개측시항.단인소방차분석현시총체적량차득분차치구유통계학의의(P<0.01).7가중심총체적득분차치여량차측시적시간간격지간무상관관계(P=0.947).결론 측시변이도재각방언측시중심지간존재차이.한어단음절식별재료수기억효응적영향소.Pearson상관계수r불괄용우측은재료복측신도적평고.
    Objective To develope 22 Chinese Mandarin monosyllable lists with good psychometrical equivalence.This study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of these lists when it was used in speech recognition test in normal hearing dialectal speakers.Methods Seven cities including Dalian,Shahghai,Hangzhou,Wuhan,Guangzhou,Fuzhou and Xiamen were selected as testing centers which contain 6 typical Chinese dialectal regions including north of China,East of China,north of Fujian,south of Fujian,Guangdong and mid-south of China.At each center,22 local normal hearing people were selected to ioin this study.Every participant was tested by each recognition test of all 22 lists twice in twosessions and same test order respectively.The second run of testing was carried out within 10 days-1 month since first run of testing.Results There was a significant correlations between scores obtained at the two sessions(r=0.682.P<0.01).Paired student-t test had shown that a gross seore of all dialectal participants was significantly higher than that of initial test to retest(P<0.01).The mean increment of score was(2.7±10.1)%.A significant difierence of test-retest score in 7 sites was 19.8% and it was equal to 5 test items.A one way ANOVA analysis had indicated that there were statistically significant difference between the score improvement of 7 test sites(P<0.01).Another analysis had shown that there was no significant correlation between test-retest score improvement and intra-session intervals(P=0.947).Conclusions Mandarin monosyllabic recognition test seems to be more stable,and the present study has indicated a systematic differences in Chinese Mandarin monosyllable recognition scores between test and retest.Monosyllable recognition test iS not susceptible to memorv effect.Pearson's correction analysis is not suitable to evaluation for test-retest reliability.
    원문보기 원문다운로드 사이트로이동
저자의 최근 논문