中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2010年
8期
1031-1032
,共2页
吕海建%徐俊赐%孟宏%方向京%陈楚群%李挺
呂海建%徐俊賜%孟宏%方嚮京%陳楚群%李挺
려해건%서준사%맹굉%방향경%진초군%리정
烧伤%细菌感染%交叉感染
燒傷%細菌感染%交扠感染
소상%세균감염%교차감염
Burns%Bacterial infections%Cross infecion
目的 探讨烧伤患者侵袭性感染的细菌学监测和抗生素使用情况.方法 100例烧伤患者测定烧伤创面和焦痂细菌分类、敏感试验和及耐药情况.结果 创面和焦痂下组织中分离出细菌382株,创面分离出细菌250株(65.4%)高于焦痂下组织分离出细菌132株(34.6%)(x~2=3.987,P<0.05).革兰阴性(G-)菌227株(59.4%)高于革兰阳性(G+)菌155株(40.6%)(x~2=3.887,P<0.05).G-杆菌中铜绿假单胞菌和肠杆菌科细菌为主要菌种,而G+球菌中金黄色葡萄球菌为主要菌种;亚胺硫霉素对铜绿假单胞菌耐药率(10.38%)明显低于庆大霉素(70.12%)(x~2=7.451,P<0.01);苯唑西林对金黄色葡萄球菌耐药率(82.14%)明显高于万古霉素(5.35%)(x~2=7.548,P<0.01).结论 对烧伤患者伴G-杆菌感染宜采用亚胺硫霉素治疗,G+球菌感染者首选万古霉素.
目的 探討燒傷患者侵襲性感染的細菌學鑑測和抗生素使用情況.方法 100例燒傷患者測定燒傷創麵和焦痂細菌分類、敏感試驗和及耐藥情況.結果 創麵和焦痂下組織中分離齣細菌382株,創麵分離齣細菌250株(65.4%)高于焦痂下組織分離齣細菌132株(34.6%)(x~2=3.987,P<0.05).革蘭陰性(G-)菌227株(59.4%)高于革蘭暘性(G+)菌155株(40.6%)(x~2=3.887,P<0.05).G-桿菌中銅綠假單胞菌和腸桿菌科細菌為主要菌種,而G+毬菌中金黃色葡萄毬菌為主要菌種;亞胺硫黴素對銅綠假單胞菌耐藥率(10.38%)明顯低于慶大黴素(70.12%)(x~2=7.451,P<0.01);苯唑西林對金黃色葡萄毬菌耐藥率(82.14%)明顯高于萬古黴素(5.35%)(x~2=7.548,P<0.01).結論 對燒傷患者伴G-桿菌感染宜採用亞胺硫黴素治療,G+毬菌感染者首選萬古黴素.
목적 탐토소상환자침습성감염적세균학감측화항생소사용정황.방법 100례소상환자측정소상창면화초가세균분류、민감시험화급내약정황.결과 창면화초가하조직중분리출세균382주,창면분리출세균250주(65.4%)고우초가하조직분리출세균132주(34.6%)(x~2=3.987,P<0.05).혁란음성(G-)균227주(59.4%)고우혁란양성(G+)균155주(40.6%)(x~2=3.887,P<0.05).G-간균중동록가단포균화장간균과세균위주요균충,이G+구균중금황색포도구균위주요균충;아알류매소대동록가단포균내약솔(10.38%)명현저우경대매소(70.12%)(x~2=7.451,P<0.01);분서서림대금황색포도구균내약솔(82.14%)명현고우만고매소(5.35%)(x~2=7.548,P<0.01).결론 대소상환자반G-간균감염의채용아알류매소치료,G+구균감염자수선만고매소.
Objective To investigate the bacteriological monitoring and antibiotic use of invasive infection in patients with burns. Method The index of burn wound、 eschar distribution、 strains of bacteria, bacterial classification、sensitivity and drug resistance were determinated in 100 cases with burns. Results The wound and eschar 382 strain were isolated from the wound and eschar;The wound bacteria 250 strain(65.4%) were significantly higher than that eschar 132 strain (34.6%) (x~2 = 3. 987,P < 0.05); Gram-negative (G -) 227 strain (59. 4%) were significantly higher than that Gram-positive(G +) 155 strain(40. 6%) (x~2 = 3. 887, P < 0.05); Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae in Gram-negative is major strains,while Staphylococcus aureus in Gram-positive is major strains;The Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance rate(10.38%) was significantly lower than gentamicin(70. 12%) (x~2 =7. 451 ,P< 0.01) ;The rate of methicillin-resistant(82. 14%) for Staphylococcus aureus was significantly higher than that of vancomycin(5.35%) (x~2 =7.548 ,P <0.01). Conclusion The Gram-negative infection could treat with imipenem,Gram-positive infections could treat with vancomycin for patients with burns.