中华麻醉学杂志
中華痳醉學雜誌
중화마취학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY
2012年
6期
680-682
,共3页
唐碧云%张丽芳%朱永满%龚明%徐春红%严敏
唐碧雲%張麗芳%硃永滿%龔明%徐春紅%嚴敏
당벽운%장려방%주영만%공명%서춘홍%엄민
疼痛,手术后%早期干预(教育)%镇痛,病人控制
疼痛,手術後%早期榦預(教育)%鎮痛,病人控製
동통,수술후%조기간예(교육)%진통,병인공제
Pain,postoperative%Early intervention (education)%Analgesia,patient-controlled
目的 评价急性疼痛服务( APS)团队早期干预对术后白控镇痛效果的影响.方法 选择2011年11~12月,在本院手术并要求术后镇痛的患者1467例,按手术月份分为对照组和干预组,其中11月份患者为对照组(n =725),12月份患者为干预组(n=742).术后均采用舒芬太尼PCIA.对照组由负责麻醉的医生和责任护士常规术前宣教、介绍PCA使用的意义、操作要点、注意事项,嘱咐患者疼痛时,按压电子镇痛泵,如10min后无缓解,由APS医生调整镇痛泵参数或加用其他镇痛药物;干预组由麻醉科APS医生、复苏室专职疼痛护士和病房疼痛护士给予系统的疼痛控制教育,包括PCA使用的意义、操作要点、镇痛药物的介绍和注意事项、疼痛评估方法及超前镇痛的必要性,在手术前和出复苏室前给予2次疼痛教育,嘱咐患者在活动前或轻度疼痛时(VAS≤3分)按压自控镇痛泵,疼痛剧烈时由APS医生调整镇痛泵参数或加用其他镇痛药物.记录镇痛不全、不良反应的发生情况及患者满意度.结果 与对照组比较,干预组镇痛不全发生率降低,患者满意度升高(P<0.05),不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 APS团队早期干预可增强术后自控镇痛效果,提高患者的满意度.
目的 評價急性疼痛服務( APS)糰隊早期榦預對術後白控鎮痛效果的影響.方法 選擇2011年11~12月,在本院手術併要求術後鎮痛的患者1467例,按手術月份分為對照組和榦預組,其中11月份患者為對照組(n =725),12月份患者為榦預組(n=742).術後均採用舒芬太尼PCIA.對照組由負責痳醉的醫生和責任護士常規術前宣教、介紹PCA使用的意義、操作要點、註意事項,囑咐患者疼痛時,按壓電子鎮痛泵,如10min後無緩解,由APS醫生調整鎮痛泵參數或加用其他鎮痛藥物;榦預組由痳醉科APS醫生、複囌室專職疼痛護士和病房疼痛護士給予繫統的疼痛控製教育,包括PCA使用的意義、操作要點、鎮痛藥物的介紹和註意事項、疼痛評估方法及超前鎮痛的必要性,在手術前和齣複囌室前給予2次疼痛教育,囑咐患者在活動前或輕度疼痛時(VAS≤3分)按壓自控鎮痛泵,疼痛劇烈時由APS醫生調整鎮痛泵參數或加用其他鎮痛藥物.記錄鎮痛不全、不良反應的髮生情況及患者滿意度.結果 與對照組比較,榦預組鎮痛不全髮生率降低,患者滿意度升高(P<0.05),不良反應髮生率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 APS糰隊早期榦預可增彊術後自控鎮痛效果,提高患者的滿意度.
목적 평개급성동통복무( APS)단대조기간예대술후백공진통효과적영향.방법 선택2011년11~12월,재본원수술병요구술후진통적환자1467례,안수술월빈분위대조조화간예조,기중11월빈환자위대조조(n =725),12월빈환자위간예조(n=742).술후균채용서분태니PCIA.대조조유부책마취적의생화책임호사상규술전선교、개소PCA사용적의의、조작요점、주의사항,촉부환자동통시,안압전자진통빙,여10min후무완해,유APS의생조정진통빙삼수혹가용기타진통약물;간예조유마취과APS의생、복소실전직동통호사화병방동통호사급여계통적동통공제교육,포괄PCA사용적의의、조작요점、진통약물적개소화주의사항、동통평고방법급초전진통적필요성,재수술전화출복소실전급여2차동통교육,촉부환자재활동전혹경도동통시(VAS≤3분)안압자공진통빙,동통극렬시유APS의생조정진통빙삼수혹가용기타진통약물.기록진통불전、불량반응적발생정황급환자만의도.결과 여대조조비교,간예조진통불전발생솔강저,환자만의도승고(P<0.05),불량반응발생솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 APS단대조기간예가증강술후자공진통효과,제고환자적만의도.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of early pain intervention provided by an acute pain service team on the efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled analgesia ( PCA).Methods One thousand four hundred and sixty-seven patients receiving postoperative PCA in November and December 2011 were enrolled in this study.Patients were excluded from the study if they were < 12 yr,unconscious or uncoorperative.The patients were divided into control group (group C,n =725) and intervention group (group 1,n =742).Group 1 received preoperative systematic pain education on the significance and conect use of PCA including pharmacology of analgesic (sufentanil 100 μg in normal saline 100 ml) by an acute pain service team made up of anesthesiologists and nurses specializing in pain management.The education was repeated immediately before operation and when the patients were discharged from recovery room.While in grup C the correct use of PCA was explained routinely before operation by anesthesiologists and nurses taking care of the patients.The incidence of incomplete analgesia and adverse reactions and patient' s satisfaction were rated.Results The incidence of incomplete analgesia was significantly lower and the patient's satisfaction higher in group 1 than in control group.There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups.Conclusion Early pain intervention provided by an acute pain service team is effective in improving the efficacy of postoperative PCA and patient's satisfaction.