检验医学
檢驗醫學
검험의학
LABORATORY MEDICINE
2010年
3期
171-175
,共5页
江虹%曾婷婷%刘怡玲%吕瑞雪%左永太%庄利芳
江虹%曾婷婷%劉怡玲%呂瑞雪%左永太%莊利芳
강홍%증정정%류이령%려서설%좌영태%장리방
不成熟粒细胞%计数%参考范围%血液分析仪
不成熟粒細胞%計數%參攷範圍%血液分析儀
불성숙립세포%계수%삼고범위%혈액분석의
Immature granulocyte%Count%Reference range%Hematology analyzer
目的 探讨血液分析仪定量检测不成熟粒细胞(IG)指数的临床应用;建立本实验室应用Sysmex XE-2100全自动血液分析仪进行IG检测的正常参考值范围.方法 应用临床标本连续测定20次,观察其批内精密度;用2个水平质控物连续测定20 d,观察其批间精密度;分别应用血液分析仪和流式细胞仪对101例标本进行IG指数测定,对其结果进行相关性回归分析和一致性比较;对883例全血标本分别用血液分析仪进行自动幼稚粒细胞计数和手工推片染色后显微镜检分类,比较血液分析仪检测与显微镜镜检的一致性;以Sysmex XE-2100全自动血液分析仪和配套试剂盒测定766名健康者的IG值,以确立本室检测的参考范围.结果 高、中、低值检测的批内精密度结果IG绝对计数的CV值分别为4.78%、5.35%、13.06%,IG百分率的CV值分别为3.82%、6.03%、14.54%;批间精密度2个水平的CV值分别为IG绝对值4.38%、5.13%;IG百分率4.3%、5.1%,均<15%,在允许范围内.与流式细胞法比较具有良好相关性,相关系数(r)为0.916;与人工镜检比较的r为0.890 3;年龄间比较各年龄组IG值间P均>0.05,即年龄间差异无统计学意义;性别间比较P<0.05,即性别间差异有统计学意义,分性别不分年龄建立本室IG检测的参考值范围为IG绝对值95%可信区间男(0,0.04×10~9/L);女(0,0.02×10~9/L).IG百分率95%可信区间男(0,0.5%);女(0,0.4%).结论 临床应用血液分析仪定量检测IG方法可行,能为临床疾病的诊断和治疗监测提供实验室数据.各实验室应建立本实验室检测的参考值范围.
目的 探討血液分析儀定量檢測不成熟粒細胞(IG)指數的臨床應用;建立本實驗室應用Sysmex XE-2100全自動血液分析儀進行IG檢測的正常參攷值範圍.方法 應用臨床標本連續測定20次,觀察其批內精密度;用2箇水平質控物連續測定20 d,觀察其批間精密度;分彆應用血液分析儀和流式細胞儀對101例標本進行IG指數測定,對其結果進行相關性迴歸分析和一緻性比較;對883例全血標本分彆用血液分析儀進行自動幼稚粒細胞計數和手工推片染色後顯微鏡檢分類,比較血液分析儀檢測與顯微鏡鏡檢的一緻性;以Sysmex XE-2100全自動血液分析儀和配套試劑盒測定766名健康者的IG值,以確立本室檢測的參攷範圍.結果 高、中、低值檢測的批內精密度結果IG絕對計數的CV值分彆為4.78%、5.35%、13.06%,IG百分率的CV值分彆為3.82%、6.03%、14.54%;批間精密度2箇水平的CV值分彆為IG絕對值4.38%、5.13%;IG百分率4.3%、5.1%,均<15%,在允許範圍內.與流式細胞法比較具有良好相關性,相關繫數(r)為0.916;與人工鏡檢比較的r為0.890 3;年齡間比較各年齡組IG值間P均>0.05,即年齡間差異無統計學意義;性彆間比較P<0.05,即性彆間差異有統計學意義,分性彆不分年齡建立本室IG檢測的參攷值範圍為IG絕對值95%可信區間男(0,0.04×10~9/L);女(0,0.02×10~9/L).IG百分率95%可信區間男(0,0.5%);女(0,0.4%).結論 臨床應用血液分析儀定量檢測IG方法可行,能為臨床疾病的診斷和治療鑑測提供實驗室數據.各實驗室應建立本實驗室檢測的參攷值範圍.
목적 탐토혈액분석의정량검측불성숙립세포(IG)지수적림상응용;건립본실험실응용Sysmex XE-2100전자동혈액분석의진행IG검측적정상삼고치범위.방법 응용림상표본련속측정20차,관찰기비내정밀도;용2개수평질공물련속측정20 d,관찰기비간정밀도;분별응용혈액분석의화류식세포의대101례표본진행IG지수측정,대기결과진행상관성회귀분석화일치성비교;대883례전혈표본분별용혈액분석의진행자동유치립세포계수화수공추편염색후현미경검분류,비교혈액분석의검측여현미경경검적일치성;이Sysmex XE-2100전자동혈액분석의화배투시제합측정766명건강자적IG치,이학립본실검측적삼고범위.결과 고、중、저치검측적비내정밀도결과IG절대계수적CV치분별위4.78%、5.35%、13.06%,IG백분솔적CV치분별위3.82%、6.03%、14.54%;비간정밀도2개수평적CV치분별위IG절대치4.38%、5.13%;IG백분솔4.3%、5.1%,균<15%,재윤허범위내.여류식세포법비교구유량호상관성,상관계수(r)위0.916;여인공경검비교적r위0.890 3;년령간비교각년령조IG치간P균>0.05,즉년령간차이무통계학의의;성별간비교P<0.05,즉성별간차이유통계학의의,분성별불분년령건립본실IG검측적삼고치범위위IG절대치95%가신구간남(0,0.04×10~9/L);녀(0,0.02×10~9/L).IG백분솔95%가신구간남(0,0.5%);녀(0,0.4%).결론 림상응용혈액분석의정량검측IG방법가행,능위림상질병적진단화치료감측제공실험실수거.각실험실응건립본실험실검측적삼고치범위.
Objective To investigate the immature granulocyte (IG) count determination by the automated hematology analyzer in clinical application and establish a normal reference range of IG of our laboratory by Sysmex XE-2100 automated hematology analyzer. Methods A clinical sample was determined successively for 20 times to ensure the intra-batch precision; 2 quality controls were determined successively for 20 days to ensure the inter-batch precision. The IG counts of 101 specimens were determined by the Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer and flow cytometry respectively,and the results were compared to evaluate the correlation. 883 whole blood specimens were determined and classified by the Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer and manual microscopy respectively,and the results were compared to evaluate the consistency. 766 healthy subjects were determined by the Sysmex XE-2100 automated hematology analyzer for determining the IG count and establishing the reference range. Results The intra-batch coefficients of variation (CV) of absolute IG counts of high, medium and low precision values were 4.78%,5.35% and 13.06% respectively. The intra-batch CVs of IG% were 3.82%,6.03% and 14.54% respectively. The inter-batch CVs of absolute IG counts of high and low values were 4.38% and 5.13% respectively. The inter-batch CVs of IG% were 4.3% and 5.1% respectively. All of them were within the tolerance limit (<15%). The correlation coefficient (r) between Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer and flow cytometry was 0.916, and that between Sysmex XE-2100 hematology analyzer and manual microscopy was 0.890 3. There was no significant difference between different ages (P>0.05),but not between male and female (P<0.05). IG reference ranges were established regardless of age. The absolute IG count reference range for male was (0,0.04×10~9/L), and for female it was (0, 0.02×10~9/L). The IG% reference range for male was (0,0.5%), and for female it was (0,0.4%). Conclusions Hematology analyzer can be used for IG count and provide data for diagnosis and therapy monitoring. Every clinical laboratory should establish its own reference range of IG count.