南通大学学报:社会科学版
南通大學學報:社會科學版
남통대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition
2011年
6期
96-102
,共7页
因子分析%旅游价值%非物质文化遗产
因子分析%旅遊價值%非物質文化遺產
인자분석%여유개치%비물질문화유산
factor analysis%tourism value%intangible cultural heritage
目前,非物质文化遗产的旅游价值评估实证研究方面的成果相对较少,而已有的非物质文化遗产旅游价值评价体系和研究方法又存在需要改进之处。通过专家访谈及在旅游者调查的基础上确定非物质文化遗产旅游价值的特征,并以游客认知趋势这一客观信息为基础,借助因子分析法构建了非物质文化遗产旅游价值评价的量化模型。随后,以南通市的蓝印花布印染技艺、风筝制作技艺、海安花鼓、童子戏、海门山歌、吕四渔民号子、浒潭花鼓、钟馗戏蝠、仿真绣这八个非物质文化遗产的旅游价值为例,对该模型的普适性及科学性进行了检验。通过检验得知,该评价体系的构建过程体现了一定的客观性和科学性,在具体使用方面拥有较高的准确性和可行性,具有较强的应用价值。
目前,非物質文化遺產的旅遊價值評估實證研究方麵的成果相對較少,而已有的非物質文化遺產旅遊價值評價體繫和研究方法又存在需要改進之處。通過專傢訪談及在旅遊者調查的基礎上確定非物質文化遺產旅遊價值的特徵,併以遊客認知趨勢這一客觀信息為基礎,藉助因子分析法構建瞭非物質文化遺產旅遊價值評價的量化模型。隨後,以南通市的藍印花佈印染技藝、風箏製作技藝、海安花鼓、童子戲、海門山歌、呂四漁民號子、滸潭花鼓、鐘馗戲蝠、倣真繡這八箇非物質文化遺產的旅遊價值為例,對該模型的普適性及科學性進行瞭檢驗。通過檢驗得知,該評價體繫的構建過程體現瞭一定的客觀性和科學性,在具體使用方麵擁有較高的準確性和可行性,具有較彊的應用價值。
목전,비물질문화유산적여유개치평고실증연구방면적성과상대교소,이이유적비물질문화유산여유개치평개체계화연구방법우존재수요개진지처。통과전가방담급재여유자조사적기출상학정비물질문화유산여유개치적특정,병이유객인지추세저일객관신식위기출,차조인자분석법구건료비물질문화유산여유개치평개적양화모형。수후,이남통시적람인화포인염기예、풍쟁제작기예、해안화고、동자희、해문산가、려사어민호자、호담화고、종규희복、방진수저팔개비물질문화유산적여유개치위례,대해모형적보괄성급과학성진행료검험。통과검험득지,해평개체계적구건과정체현료일정적객관성화과학성,재구체사용방면옹유교고적준학성화가행성,구유교강적응용개치。
Currently study on the assessment of tourism value of Intangible Cultural Heritage is relatiVely few while the existing evaluation system and approach still leave much to be desired. Accordingly, the paper, through expert interviews and surveys from tourists, defines the features of Intangible Cultural Heritage and of the help of the factor analysis, constructs the quantitative model of tourism value evaluation, based on the objective information about the cognitive from tourists. Then the applicability and accuracy of the model is tested on the artistry of printing and dyeing of blueprint cloth, the skill of Kite-making, Haian Floral drum, Tongzi Dramas, Haimen Rustic Songs, work song of fish men in Lusi, Huling Flower Drum and the simulated embroidery in Nantong .Through the test, it can be proved that this evaluation system is of high accuracy and feasibility. Since the sampling survey of this research is only carried out in Nantong, the evaluation index system would be more perfect if the survey could be conducted in a more extensive range of the other Intangible Cultural Heritage.