中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2011年
27期
3275-3277
,共3页
贾博军%王红新%董晓静%徐宇佳%李悦%姬永姣
賈博軍%王紅新%董曉靜%徐宇佳%李悅%姬永姣
가박군%왕홍신%동효정%서우가%리열%희영교
造血干细胞移植%西咪替丁%口腔黏膜炎%雾化吸入
造血榦細胞移植%西咪替丁%口腔黏膜炎%霧化吸入
조혈간세포이식%서미체정%구강점막염%무화흡입
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation%Cimetidine%Oral mucositis%Aerosol inhalation
目的 探讨西咪替丁氧气雾化吸入防治造血干细胞移植患者口腔黏膜炎的效果。方法 将造血干细胞移植的患者120例,随机分为未雾化吸入组(A组,40例)、雾化吸入盐水组(B组,40例)和雾化吸入西咪替丁组(C组,40例),观察各组口腔黏膜炎的防治效果。结果 雾化吸入西咪替丁组口腔黏膜炎的发生率40.0%,低于未雾化吸入组67.5%和雾化吸入盐水组50.0%,差异有统计学意义(x2 =6.216,P<0.05),口腔黏膜炎Ⅱ~Ⅳ级发生率三组比较差异有统计学意义(x2=6.278,P<0.05);首发黏膜炎时间和持续时间三组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),雾化吸入西咪替丁组首发黏膜炎时间晚,持续时间短。结论 采用两咪替丁氧气雾化吸入的方式能有效的防治移植过程中口腔黏膜炎的发生,使口腔黏膜炎的发生率显著下降,减轻了患者痛苦,提高移植成功率。
目的 探討西咪替丁氧氣霧化吸入防治造血榦細胞移植患者口腔黏膜炎的效果。方法 將造血榦細胞移植的患者120例,隨機分為未霧化吸入組(A組,40例)、霧化吸入鹽水組(B組,40例)和霧化吸入西咪替丁組(C組,40例),觀察各組口腔黏膜炎的防治效果。結果 霧化吸入西咪替丁組口腔黏膜炎的髮生率40.0%,低于未霧化吸入組67.5%和霧化吸入鹽水組50.0%,差異有統計學意義(x2 =6.216,P<0.05),口腔黏膜炎Ⅱ~Ⅳ級髮生率三組比較差異有統計學意義(x2=6.278,P<0.05);首髮黏膜炎時間和持續時間三組比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05),霧化吸入西咪替丁組首髮黏膜炎時間晚,持續時間短。結論 採用兩咪替丁氧氣霧化吸入的方式能有效的防治移植過程中口腔黏膜炎的髮生,使口腔黏膜炎的髮生率顯著下降,減輕瞭患者痛苦,提高移植成功率。
목적 탐토서미체정양기무화흡입방치조혈간세포이식환자구강점막염적효과。방법 장조혈간세포이식적환자120례,수궤분위미무화흡입조(A조,40례)、무화흡입염수조(B조,40례)화무화흡입서미체정조(C조,40례),관찰각조구강점막염적방치효과。결과 무화흡입서미체정조구강점막염적발생솔40.0%,저우미무화흡입조67.5%화무화흡입염수조50.0%,차이유통계학의의(x2 =6.216,P<0.05),구강점막염Ⅱ~Ⅳ급발생솔삼조비교차이유통계학의의(x2=6.278,P<0.05);수발점막염시간화지속시간삼조비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05),무화흡입서미체정조수발점막염시간만,지속시간단。결론 채용량미체정양기무화흡입적방식능유효적방치이식과정중구강점막염적발생,사구강점막염적발생솔현저하강,감경료환자통고,제고이식성공솔。
Objective To study the effect of cimetidine aerosol inhalation on preventing and treating oral mucositis (OM) in patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods 120 patients receiving HSCT were divided into three groups. The patients in group A ( n =40 ) did not receive aerosol inhalation, the patients in group B (n =40) were treated by normal sodium aerosol inhalation, and the patients in group C ( n =40) were treated by cimetidine aerosol inhalation. The preventive and curative effects between the three groups were observed and compared. Results The incidence rate of OM in group C was 40.0%, was less than no aerosol inhalation group ( 67. 5% ) and normal sodium aerosol inhalation group (50.0%), the difference was statistically significant(x2 =6. 216,P <0. 05). The Ⅱ - Ⅳ degree of OM in three groups were statistically significant( x2 =6.278, P < 0. 05 ) ; the occurrence of OM and the duration were statistically different ( P < 0. 05 ). The occurrence of OM was delay and the duration was shortened in cimetidine aerosol inhalation ( P < 0. 01 ). Conclusions Cimetidine atomizing inhalation is effective on OM in HSCT recipients, the incidence rate of OM decreased significantly, which could reduce the patients' suffering and increase the achievement ratio of HSCT.