实用口腔医学杂志
實用口腔醫學雜誌
실용구강의학잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL STOMATOLOGY
2009年
4期
467-470
,共4页
于玲%王晓燕%田福聪%高学军
于玲%王曉燕%田福聰%高學軍
우령%왕효연%전복총%고학군
牙本质%粘接强度%粘接界面
牙本質%粘接彊度%粘接界麵
아본질%점접강도%점접계면
Dentin%Bond strength%Bond interface
目的:采用一种新的界面处理方法,对不同类型牙本质粘接剂的粘接强度与界面形态进行研究.方法:选取人无龋磨牙,暴露咬合面牙本质,分别使用3 种粘接剂(Single Bond,SB;Clearfil SE Bond,SE;Clearfil S3 Bond,S3)制备粘接样本.粘接样本切割成粘接界面约为0.9 mm×0.9 mm的柱形小条,用微拉伸测力仪测试粘接强度(n=15).另外将粘接样本依次用6 mol/L盐酸、5%次氯酸钠和0.08 mg/ml透明质酸酶溶液处理,扫描电镜观察粘接界面形态.结果: 3 种粘接剂的牙本质粘接强度分别为:SB (35.50±6.40) MPa,SE (45.06±5.29) MPa,S3 (30.46±3.82) MPa,三者之间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).SB粘接界面的树脂突长约9~12 μm,部分样本出现混合层易与粘接剂层分离.SE形成的树脂突长约9~14 μm,无混合层与粘接剂层分离现象.使用S3后,树脂突稀疏,长约4~7 μm,混合层与粘接剂层结合紧密.结论:牙本质粘接剂的粘接界面形态与粘接强度存在一定的相关性.
目的:採用一種新的界麵處理方法,對不同類型牙本質粘接劑的粘接彊度與界麵形態進行研究.方法:選取人無齲磨牙,暴露咬閤麵牙本質,分彆使用3 種粘接劑(Single Bond,SB;Clearfil SE Bond,SE;Clearfil S3 Bond,S3)製備粘接樣本.粘接樣本切割成粘接界麵約為0.9 mm×0.9 mm的柱形小條,用微拉伸測力儀測試粘接彊度(n=15).另外將粘接樣本依次用6 mol/L鹽痠、5%次氯痠鈉和0.08 mg/ml透明質痠酶溶液處理,掃描電鏡觀察粘接界麵形態.結果: 3 種粘接劑的牙本質粘接彊度分彆為:SB (35.50±6.40) MPa,SE (45.06±5.29) MPa,S3 (30.46±3.82) MPa,三者之間差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05).SB粘接界麵的樹脂突長約9~12 μm,部分樣本齣現混閤層易與粘接劑層分離.SE形成的樹脂突長約9~14 μm,無混閤層與粘接劑層分離現象.使用S3後,樹脂突稀疏,長約4~7 μm,混閤層與粘接劑層結閤緊密.結論:牙本質粘接劑的粘接界麵形態與粘接彊度存在一定的相關性.
목적:채용일충신적계면처리방법,대불동류형아본질점접제적점접강도여계면형태진행연구.방법:선취인무우마아,폭로교합면아본질,분별사용3 충점접제(Single Bond,SB;Clearfil SE Bond,SE;Clearfil S3 Bond,S3)제비점접양본.점접양본절할성점접계면약위0.9 mm×0.9 mm적주형소조,용미랍신측력의측시점접강도(n=15).령외장점접양본의차용6 mol/L염산、5%차록산납화0.08 mg/ml투명질산매용액처리,소묘전경관찰점접계면형태.결과: 3 충점접제적아본질점접강도분별위:SB (35.50±6.40) MPa,SE (45.06±5.29) MPa,S3 (30.46±3.82) MPa,삼자지간차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05).SB점접계면적수지돌장약9~12 μm,부분양본출현혼합층역여점접제층분리.SE형성적수지돌장약9~14 μm,무혼합층여점접제층분리현상.사용S3후,수지돌희소,장약4~7 μm,혼합층여점접제층결합긴밀.결론:아본질점접제적점접계면형태여점접강도존재일정적상관성.
Objective: To evaluate bond strength and interface of various dentin adhesives by a modified interface processing method. Methods:Nine extracted human molars were ground to expose fresh dentin surface. Three dentin adhesives (Single Bond, Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil S3 Bond) were applied respectively and a block of composite resin was built up. The specimens were then stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37 ℃ and sectioned into beams of 0.9 mm×0.9 mm cross-sectional area. The microtensile bond strength was determined with Microtensile Tester(n=15). In addition, the bonding specimens were conditioned with 6 mol/L HCl, 5% NaOCl and 0.08 mg/ml hyaluronidase to observe the adhesive interfaces by SEM. Results: Significant differences in bond strength were observed among the three adhesives(P<0.05): SE Bond (45.06±5.29) MPa> Single Bond (35.50±6.40) MPa> S3 Bond (30.46±3.82) MPa. Single Bond showed resin tags about 9-12 μm long and gaps between hybrid and adhesive layers. No obvious boundary between hybrid layer and adhesive were observed for both SE Bond and S3 Bond, while the length of resin tags were 9-14 μm and 4-7 μm for SE Bond and S3 Bond respectively. Conclusion:The morphology of the bond interface of dentin adhesive has a relationship with the bond strength.