成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)
成都理工大學學報(自然科學版)
성도리공대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF CHENGDU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITION)
2009年
4期
373-378
,共6页
王国芝%刘树根%时华星%徐国强%周文
王國芝%劉樹根%時華星%徐國彊%週文
왕국지%류수근%시화성%서국강%주문
伊朗%库姆盆地%库姆组%流体包裹体%拉曼成分%均一温度
伊朗%庫姆盆地%庫姆組%流體包裹體%拉曼成分%均一溫度
이랑%고모분지%고모조%류체포과체%랍만성분%균일온도
Iran%Qom Formation%Qom Basin,fluid inclusion%Laman composition%homogeneous temperature
通过对伊朗库姆盆地Aran2井和FKH1井含烃盐水包裹体成分和均一温度的对比研究,揭示油气充注和成藏过程.含烃盐水流体包裹体成分和均一温度研究表明,Aran2井和FKH1井分别有过3期和4期含烃流体充注;流体体系主要为(CO2-有机)-H2O,(CO-有机)-H2O和(H2S+CO2-有机)-H2O体系.流体包裹体气相部分较液相部分富含有机相、较高的均一温度和缺少液态烃包裹体,表明两口井所充注的并不是与Aran1井类似的液态石油,而是富氮或不含氮的天然气.富氮的天然气可能是来自下伏侏罗系油藏裂解后形成的裂解气,不含氮的天然气可能是下伏Shemshak组烃源岩二次生烃的产物.Aran2井具有相对好的保存条件而使气藏得以保存, FKH1井具有较差的保存条件使气藏被破坏和逸散.
通過對伊朗庫姆盆地Aran2井和FKH1井含烴鹽水包裹體成分和均一溫度的對比研究,揭示油氣充註和成藏過程.含烴鹽水流體包裹體成分和均一溫度研究錶明,Aran2井和FKH1井分彆有過3期和4期含烴流體充註;流體體繫主要為(CO2-有機)-H2O,(CO-有機)-H2O和(H2S+CO2-有機)-H2O體繫.流體包裹體氣相部分較液相部分富含有機相、較高的均一溫度和缺少液態烴包裹體,錶明兩口井所充註的併不是與Aran1井類似的液態石油,而是富氮或不含氮的天然氣.富氮的天然氣可能是來自下伏侏囉繫油藏裂解後形成的裂解氣,不含氮的天然氣可能是下伏Shemshak組烴源巖二次生烴的產物.Aran2井具有相對好的保存條件而使氣藏得以保存, FKH1井具有較差的保存條件使氣藏被破壞和逸散.
통과대이랑고모분지Aran2정화FKH1정함경염수포과체성분화균일온도적대비연구,게시유기충주화성장과정.함경염수류체포과체성분화균일온도연구표명,Aran2정화FKH1정분별유과3기화4기함경류체충주;류체체계주요위(CO2-유궤)-H2O,(CO-유궤)-H2O화(H2S+CO2-유궤)-H2O체계.류체포과체기상부분교액상부분부함유궤상、교고적균일온도화결소액태경포과체,표명량구정소충주적병불시여Aran1정유사적액태석유,이시부담혹불함담적천연기.부담적천연기가능시래자하복주라계유장렬해후형성적렬해기,불함담적천연기가능시하복Shemshak조경원암이차생경적산물.Aran2정구유상대호적보존조건이사기장득이보존, FKH1정구유교차적보존조건사기장피파배화일산.
Based on the comparison of the composition and homogeneous temperature of salt-water inclusions with hydrocarbon between Well Aran2 and Well FKH1 in Iran Qom Basin, this paper reveals the process of oil/gas injection and accumulation. Based on the composition and homogeneous temperature of fluid inclusions, three and four stages of hydrocarbon-bearing fluid injection can be identified in Well Aran2 and Well FKH1, respectively. Three kinds of fluid system are suggested. They are (CO2-hydrocarbon) -H2O, (CO-hydrocarbon) -H2O and (H2S+CO2-hydrocarbon) -H2O. The facts, such as more abundant hydrocarbon in gas phase than that in liquid phase, higher homogeneous temperature and absence of liquid hydrocarbon inclusion, suggest that both wells were filled with the gas with abundant or less nitrogen and they are much different from Well Aran1 filled with oil. The gas with abundant nitrogen may be the cracking gas produced by the crack of trapped hydrocarbon in underlying Jurassic;the gas with less nitrogen may be ascribed to the secondary generating hydrocarbon of underlying Shemshak Formation. The preservation condition of the Well Aran2 is better than that of Well FKH1. So the trapped gas in Well Aran2 can be preserved well while that in Well FKH1 was destructed and dissipated.