CAJ | 학술논문

现行法律规定的确定知识产权侵权赔偿数额的模式无法最大限度地保护知识产权,而目前知识产权侵权案件存在大量的通过调解和撤诉结案的现象。高调解率和高撤诉率并非知识产权侵权案件与生俱来的独有现象,而是现有法律维权方式不力的无奈之举,在权利人无法证明因侵权所受的损失或侵权人因侵权所获得的利益的前提下,权利人最经济、快捷的获得赔偿的途径就是调解和撤诉,但同样,这对于侵权人来说也是最经济的。
현행법률규정적학정지식산권침권배상수액적모식무법최대한도지보호지식산권,이목전지식산권침권안건존재대량적통과조해화철소결안적현상。고조해솔화고철소솔병비지식산권침권안건여생구래적독유현상,이시현유법률유권방식불력적무내지거,재권리인무법증명인침권소수적손실혹침권인인침권소획득적이익적전제하,권리인최경제、쾌첩적획득배상적도경취시조해화철소,단동양,저대우침권인래설야시최경제적。
The compensation model in law can＇t go to such great extents to protect the intellectual property,so,many intellectual property cases have been solved by the way of conciliation and action abandonment.The high rate of the conciliation and action abandonment is not the natural characteristic of the intellectual case but the result of the compensation model.When the obligee can＇t prove the his loss or the infringer＇s gains,the best solution is conciliation and action abandonment.However,it is also the infringer＇s best solution.