棉花学报
棉花學報
면화학보
COTTON SCIENCE
2010年
1期
83-88
,共6页
郭伟锋%曹新川%胡守林%梅拥军
郭偉鋒%曹新川%鬍守林%梅擁軍
곽위봉%조신천%호수림%매옹군
海岛棉%加-显-母体遗传模型%单株铃数%条件遗传相关
海島棉%加-顯-母體遺傳模型%單株鈴數%條件遺傳相關
해도면%가-현-모체유전모형%단주령수%조건유전상관
island cotton%ADM genetic model%boll number per plant%conditional genetic correlation
采用包括基因型与环境互作的加性-显性-母体遗传模型,分析了两年的海岛棉7个亲本及其21个F_1组合不同发育期的单株成铃数资料.遗传方差分析表明,成铃前期遗传主效应与遗传X环境互作效应所占比例相当;成铃中期加性效应和显性效应的影响降低,显性×环境互作效应及母体×环境互作效应增加;成铃后期遗传×环境互作效应在8月2日上升至最大,之后逐渐下降但仍然起重要作用.控制单株成铃数的基因在成铃前期到7月17日表达比较活跃.同一遗传效应的非条件遗传相关多为显著的正值,而条件遗传相关则检测到显著负值与正值.两种分析方法的结合能充分阐明海岛棉成铃发育中的基因活动特点.结果表明:海岛棉单株成铃性状的发育遗传特点与陆地棉存在差异.
採用包括基因型與環境互作的加性-顯性-母體遺傳模型,分析瞭兩年的海島棉7箇親本及其21箇F_1組閤不同髮育期的單株成鈴數資料.遺傳方差分析錶明,成鈴前期遺傳主效應與遺傳X環境互作效應所佔比例相噹;成鈴中期加性效應和顯性效應的影響降低,顯性×環境互作效應及母體×環境互作效應增加;成鈴後期遺傳×環境互作效應在8月2日上升至最大,之後逐漸下降但仍然起重要作用.控製單株成鈴數的基因在成鈴前期到7月17日錶達比較活躍.同一遺傳效應的非條件遺傳相關多為顯著的正值,而條件遺傳相關則檢測到顯著負值與正值.兩種分析方法的結閤能充分闡明海島棉成鈴髮育中的基因活動特點.結果錶明:海島棉單株成鈴性狀的髮育遺傳特點與陸地棉存在差異.
채용포괄기인형여배경호작적가성-현성-모체유전모형,분석료량년적해도면7개친본급기21개F_1조합불동발육기적단주성령수자료.유전방차분석표명,성령전기유전주효응여유전X배경호작효응소점비례상당;성령중기가성효응화현성효응적영향강저,현성×배경호작효응급모체×배경호작효응증가;성령후기유전×배경호작효응재8월2일상승지최대,지후축점하강단잉연기중요작용.공제단주성령수적기인재성령전기도7월17일표체비교활약.동일유전효응적비조건유전상관다위현저적정치,이조건유전상관칙검측도현저부치여정치.량충분석방법적결합능충분천명해도면성령발육중적기인활동특점.결과표명:해도면단주성령성상적발육유전특점여륙지면존재차이.
An additive-dominant-matemal model with genotypexenvironment interaction was applied to analyze developmental genetics for the boll number per plant at different stages in two years. The experimental data were obtained from seven island cotton varieties and their 21 F_1 crosses. It was showed that genetic main and GxE effects were predominant at the early boll stage.Additive and dominant effects reduced at the middle stage while D×E and M×E effects increased continually. At the late boll stage G×E effects increased to maximum at August 2, it reduced gradually since then but played a more important role than other effects. Gene expression was very active during prior stage of bolling to July 17. Significant unconditional positive correla-tion was detected for the same genetic effect while conditional correlation was positive or negative. The combination of two ana-lytic methods can explain clearly the gene expression feature for developmental behavior of boll number per plant. The results showed that the genetic developmental features of boll number per plant are different from upland cotton in island cotton.