中国人兽共患病杂志
中國人獸共患病雜誌
중국인수공환병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ZOONOSES
2000年
2期
59-61,34
,共4页
钱绩虎%严建国%丁昌慧%汤权%朱金阳%曹树梅
錢績虎%嚴建國%丁昌慧%湯權%硃金暘%曹樹梅
전적호%엄건국%정창혜%탕권%주금양%조수매
狂犬病%狂犬病疫苗%干扰素%免疫程序%免疫调节
狂犬病%狂犬病疫苗%榦擾素%免疫程序%免疫調節
광견병%광견병역묘%간우소%면역정서%면역조절
Rabies%Rabies vaccine%Interferon%Regulation of immunity%Immunization schedule
目的 研究IFN+2-2-1程序和2-2-1程序应用的可行性,探讨IFN的免疫调节作用。方法 IFN+2-2-1程序:于0、7、14天分别注射5.0、5.0、2.5IU PHKCV,于0天同时加注20万IUα-IFN;2-2-1程序:于0、7、14天分别注射5.0、5.0、2.5IUPHKCV;对照:应用WHO推荐的常规程序。结果 ①3种程序免疫后的GMT:7天时分别为1.71、1.57、1.21(*P<0.05);14天时分别为62.77、58.79、28.96**(**P<0.01);45天时分别为76.64、72.90、62.77。②各组的阳转率:7天时分别为55.00%、33.3%、20.00%*(*P<0.05);14天时全部达到100%。③各组的各种副反应发生率(在0~55%之间)均无显著性差别。结论 小剂量的IFN有增强免疫应答的作用;首次免疫时用双倍剂量的疫苗有显著的高免疫应答效应;IFN+2-2-1程序优于2-2-1程序,后者又优于常规程序。
目的 研究IFN+2-2-1程序和2-2-1程序應用的可行性,探討IFN的免疫調節作用。方法 IFN+2-2-1程序:于0、7、14天分彆註射5.0、5.0、2.5IU PHKCV,于0天同時加註20萬IUα-IFN;2-2-1程序:于0、7、14天分彆註射5.0、5.0、2.5IUPHKCV;對照:應用WHO推薦的常規程序。結果 ①3種程序免疫後的GMT:7天時分彆為1.71、1.57、1.21(*P<0.05);14天時分彆為62.77、58.79、28.96**(**P<0.01);45天時分彆為76.64、72.90、62.77。②各組的暘轉率:7天時分彆為55.00%、33.3%、20.00%*(*P<0.05);14天時全部達到100%。③各組的各種副反應髮生率(在0~55%之間)均無顯著性差彆。結論 小劑量的IFN有增彊免疫應答的作用;首次免疫時用雙倍劑量的疫苗有顯著的高免疫應答效應;IFN+2-2-1程序優于2-2-1程序,後者又優于常規程序。
목적 연구IFN+2-2-1정서화2-2-1정서응용적가행성,탐토IFN적면역조절작용。방법 IFN+2-2-1정서:우0、7、14천분별주사5.0、5.0、2.5IU PHKCV,우0천동시가주20만IUα-IFN;2-2-1정서:우0、7、14천분별주사5.0、5.0、2.5IUPHKCV;대조:응용WHO추천적상규정서。결과 ①3충정서면역후적GMT:7천시분별위1.71、1.57、1.21(*P<0.05);14천시분별위62.77、58.79、28.96**(**P<0.01);45천시분별위76.64、72.90、62.77。②각조적양전솔:7천시분별위55.00%、33.3%、20.00%*(*P<0.05);14천시전부체도100%。③각조적각충부반응발생솔(재0~55%지간)균무현저성차별。결론 소제량적IFN유증강면역응답적작용;수차면역시용쌍배제량적역묘유현저적고면역응답효응;IFN+2-2-1정서우우2-2-1정서,후자우우우상규정서。
Aim To study the possibility of using IFN + 2-2-1schedule and 2-2-1schedule , and to discuss the mechanism of the regultion of immunuity of IFN. Methods The IFN + 2-2-1 schedule: Injecting 5.0, 5.0, 2.5IU PHKCV on the 0, 7th and 14th day respectively and injecting 0.2 million IU IFN-α simultaneously on the 0 day. The 2-2-1 schedule: Injecting 5.0, 5.0, 2.5IU PHKCV on the 0, 7th, 14th day respectively. Control group: Using the routine schedule recommended by WHO.Results (①)TheGMTofeachgroupwas1.71, 1.57, 1.21* (*P<0.05) respectively on the 7th day, 62.77, 58.79, 28.96** (* *P <0.01) respectively on the 14th day, and 76.64, 72.9, 67.22 respectively on the 45th day.(②)The positive rate of antibody of each group was 55.00%, 33.33%, 20.00%* (*P, 0.05) respectively on the 7th day and became100 % all on the 14th day. (③) The rate of each kind of side reaction of each group was between 0 and 55%, but there wos no significant difference. Conclusion
Lower dose of IFN had the effect of enhancing immunization. The double dose of vaccine when firstly immunizing had the higher effect of immune response. The IFN + 2-2-1 schedule was better than the 2-2-1 schedule, while the 2-2-1 schedule was better than the routine schedule.