第四纪研究
第四紀研究
제사기연구
2010年
2期
287-297
,共11页
张健平%吕厚远%吴乃琴%李丰江%杨晓燕%王炜林%马明志%张小虎
張健平%呂厚遠%吳迺琴%李豐江%楊曉燕%王煒林%馬明誌%張小虎
장건평%려후원%오내금%리봉강%양효연%왕위림%마명지%장소호
植硅体%黍%粟%水稻%关中盆地%仰韶文化%龙山文化
植硅體%黍%粟%水稻%關中盆地%仰韶文化%龍山文化
식규체%서%속%수도%관중분지%앙소문화%룡산문화
phytolith%common millet%foxtail millet%rice%Guanzhong Basin%Yangshao Culture%Longshan Culture
黍、粟是我国北方两种重要的旱作农作物,对中华文明起源和发展产生过重要的影响.长期以来由于受到考古样品保存及研究方法的限制,早期考古发掘报道的我国关中盆地新石器遗存的农作物多是以粟为主或粟、黍不分,统称粟类作物,缺少对该区新石器时期粟、黍农业状况的深入研究.本文利用植硅体方法,分别对现代黍、粟和水稻种子的植硅体产量以及关中盆地新石器考古样品中的植硅体进行分析.结果表明,等重量的黍、粟种子稃片的植硅体产量基本相等,其植硅体含量所反映的是黍、粟的相对产量(重量);水稻双峰型植硅体的百分含量比水稻实际含量相对偏低.关中盆地泉护、杨官寨、浒西庄、案板、王家嘴,水沟等6个考古遗址17个~(14)C年龄和47个植硅体样品分析结果显示,约 6000~2100cal.aB.P.期间,关中盆地黍子的植硅体含量一直占优势(3.4% ~34.5% ),粟次之(0~6.2% ),即使在气候相对暖湿的阶段,黍的产量仍超过粟.泉护、杨官寨、浒西庄,案板等遗址的个别样品中保存水稻植硅体.这些结果为重新认识关中地区新石器时期农业生产与社会经济形态以及与气候环境条件的关系提供了新的参考资料.
黍、粟是我國北方兩種重要的旱作農作物,對中華文明起源和髮展產生過重要的影響.長期以來由于受到攷古樣品保存及研究方法的限製,早期攷古髮掘報道的我國關中盆地新石器遺存的農作物多是以粟為主或粟、黍不分,統稱粟類作物,缺少對該區新石器時期粟、黍農業狀況的深入研究.本文利用植硅體方法,分彆對現代黍、粟和水稻種子的植硅體產量以及關中盆地新石器攷古樣品中的植硅體進行分析.結果錶明,等重量的黍、粟種子稃片的植硅體產量基本相等,其植硅體含量所反映的是黍、粟的相對產量(重量);水稻雙峰型植硅體的百分含量比水稻實際含量相對偏低.關中盆地泉護、楊官寨、滸西莊、案闆、王傢嘴,水溝等6箇攷古遺阯17箇~(14)C年齡和47箇植硅體樣品分析結果顯示,約 6000~2100cal.aB.P.期間,關中盆地黍子的植硅體含量一直佔優勢(3.4% ~34.5% ),粟次之(0~6.2% ),即使在氣候相對暖濕的階段,黍的產量仍超過粟.泉護、楊官寨、滸西莊,案闆等遺阯的箇彆樣品中保存水稻植硅體.這些結果為重新認識關中地區新石器時期農業生產與社會經濟形態以及與氣候環境條件的關繫提供瞭新的參攷資料.
서、속시아국북방량충중요적한작농작물,대중화문명기원화발전산생과중요적영향.장기이래유우수도고고양품보존급연구방법적한제,조기고고발굴보도적아국관중분지신석기유존적농작물다시이속위주혹속、서불분,통칭속류작물,결소대해구신석기시기속、서농업상황적심입연구.본문이용식규체방법,분별대현대서、속화수도충자적식규체산량이급관중분지신석기고고양품중적식규체진행분석.결과표명,등중량적서、속충자부편적식규체산량기본상등,기식규체함량소반영적시서、속적상대산량(중량);수도쌍봉형식규체적백분함량비수도실제함량상대편저.관중분지천호、양관채、호서장、안판、왕가취,수구등6개고고유지17개~(14)C년령화47개식규체양품분석결과현시,약 6000~2100cal.aB.P.기간,관중분지서자적식규체함량일직점우세(3.4% ~34.5% ),속차지(0~6.2% ),즉사재기후상대난습적계단,서적산량잉초과속.천호、양관채、호서장,안판등유지적개별양품중보존수도식규체.저사결과위중신인식관중지구신석기시기농업생산여사회경제형태이급여기후배경조건적관계제공료신적삼고자료.
Foxtail millet(Setaria italica)and common millet(Panicum miliaceum)are vitally important food crops for people living in East Asia and even in the entire Eurasian continent prior to the popularity of rice and wheat. However,owing to constrained methodology in millet identification and limited archaeological samples,the history of millet cultivation in the Guanzhong Basin,North China is still problematic. In this paper,we firstly analyzed phytoliths from modern millets and rice husks(4 species respectively)to clarify the implications of crop phytolith quantity in archaeological samples by wet oxidation method(using nitric acid to oxidize organic materials completely)and dry ashing method(using high temperature baking to oxidize organic materials completely). Then we identified millet and rice husk phytoliths from 47 archaeological samples in the Guanzhong Basin,including 18 samples from the Quanhu profile,19 samples from the Yangguanzhai profile,and 10 pit samples from Quanhu,Yangguanzhai,Huxizhuang,Anban,Wangjiazui and Shuigou sites using a newly developed method of distinguishing common millets and foxtail millets. The analysis of modern crop husk phytoliths reveals that the same weight of common millet and foxtail millet yield almost the same amount of phytoliths. The quantity of these husk phytoliths reflects the relative production of the two millets rather than the quantity of individual grains collected by flotation. We consider that the quantity of foxtail millet grains concentrated by flotation should be divided by 3 or more to reflect substantially the relatively real production of the two millets in the archaeological samples. Moreover,the percentage of double peaked phytolith of rice husk may underestimate the actual quantity of rice. All 47 archaeological samples and 17 ~(14)C age data indicate that the percentage of common millet was always much higher(3.4% ~34.5% )than that of foxtail millet(0~6.2% )in ca.6000~2100cal.aB.P. Even in the relative warm-wet phase,the output of common millets was still higher than that of foxtail millet. Rice may be locally cultivated in Quanhu,Yangguanzhai,Huxizhuang,and Anban sites. These results provide a new referencre for evaluating the relationship in different agricultural patterns,socio-economic modes and climate changes in the Guanzhong Basin during Neolithic epoch.