热带亚热带植物学报
熱帶亞熱帶植物學報
열대아열대식물학보
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPICAL BOTANY
2009年
6期
549-555
,共7页
周群英%陈少雄%吴志华%陈宏%林良柱%韩斐扬
週群英%陳少雄%吳誌華%陳宏%林良柱%韓斐颺
주군영%진소웅%오지화%진굉%림량주%한비양
桉树%灰分%热值%樟木头%广东
桉樹%灰分%熱值%樟木頭%廣東
안수%회분%열치%장목두%엄동
Eucalyptus%Ash content%Caloric value%Zhangmutou%Guangdong
对广东省东莞市樟木头林场5种6 a生巨桉(Eucalyptus grandis)、柳桉(E.saligna)、大花序桉(E.cloeziana)、粗皮桉(E.pellita)和托里桉(E.torelliana)的能量特征进行研究.结果表明:5种桉树不同组分的灰分含量和热值存在显著差异(P<0.01).灰分含量为0.16%-8.37%,其中巨桉、柳桉、粗皮桉和托里桉均是叶>皮>枝>根>干,而大花序桉为皮>叶>枝>根>干;各组分的干重热值为15.12-18.85 kJ g~(-1),均以叶最高、皮最低,巨桉与粗皮桉为叶>枝>干>根>皮;柳桉与托里桉为叶>干>枝>根>皮;大花序桉为叶>枝>根>干>皮;去灰分热值为16.37~19.87 kJ g~(-1),除粗皮桉为叶>枝>皮>干>根外,其它4种各组分的去灰分热值均与干重热值的变化趋势相同.5种桉树的平均干重热值和去灰分热值分别以巨桉、粗皮桉最高,但均以托里桉最低.
對廣東省東莞市樟木頭林場5種6 a生巨桉(Eucalyptus grandis)、柳桉(E.saligna)、大花序桉(E.cloeziana)、粗皮桉(E.pellita)和託裏桉(E.torelliana)的能量特徵進行研究.結果錶明:5種桉樹不同組分的灰分含量和熱值存在顯著差異(P<0.01).灰分含量為0.16%-8.37%,其中巨桉、柳桉、粗皮桉和託裏桉均是葉>皮>枝>根>榦,而大花序桉為皮>葉>枝>根>榦;各組分的榦重熱值為15.12-18.85 kJ g~(-1),均以葉最高、皮最低,巨桉與粗皮桉為葉>枝>榦>根>皮;柳桉與託裏桉為葉>榦>枝>根>皮;大花序桉為葉>枝>根>榦>皮;去灰分熱值為16.37~19.87 kJ g~(-1),除粗皮桉為葉>枝>皮>榦>根外,其它4種各組分的去灰分熱值均與榦重熱值的變化趨勢相同.5種桉樹的平均榦重熱值和去灰分熱值分彆以巨桉、粗皮桉最高,但均以託裏桉最低.
대광동성동완시장목두림장5충6 a생거안(Eucalyptus grandis)、류안(E.saligna)、대화서안(E.cloeziana)、조피안(E.pellita)화탁리안(E.torelliana)적능량특정진행연구.결과표명:5충안수불동조분적회분함량화열치존재현저차이(P<0.01).회분함량위0.16%-8.37%,기중거안、류안、조피안화탁리안균시협>피>지>근>간,이대화서안위피>협>지>근>간;각조분적간중열치위15.12-18.85 kJ g~(-1),균이협최고、피최저,거안여조피안위협>지>간>근>피;류안여탁리안위협>간>지>근>피;대화서안위협>지>근>간>피;거회분열치위16.37~19.87 kJ g~(-1),제조피안위협>지>피>간>근외,기타4충각조분적거회분열치균여간중열치적변화추세상동.5충안수적평균간중열치화거회분열치분별이거안、조피안최고,단균이탁리안최저.
Energy characteristics of 6-year-old trees of Eucalyptus grandis,E.saligna,E.cloeziana,E.pellita and E.torelliana in Zhangmutou Forest Farm in southern Guangdong Province were studied.The results showed that there were significant differences in ash content and caloric value of various above and below ground components (P<0.01).Ash contents ranged from 0.16%to 8.37%,with the components in E'.grandis,E.saligna,E.pellita and E. torelliana had order as leaves>bark>branches>roots>stem-wood,and that in E.cloeziana as bark>leaves>branches>roots>stem-wood.Gross caloric values(GCV)of various components ranged from 15.12 to 18.85 kJ g~(-1)with leaves having the highest GCVs and bark the lowest.For E.grandis and E. pellita,the order of components was leaves>branches>stem-wood>roots>bark,for E.saligna and E.torelliana was leaves>stem-wood>branches>roots>bark and for E.cloeziana leaves>branches>roots>stem-wood>bark.Ash free caloric values(AFCV)of components ranged from 16.37 to 19.87 kJ g~(-1) and the order of components by AFCVs were the same as those for GVCs for E.grandis,E.saligna,E.cloeziana and E.torelliana,and that tor E. pellita as leaves>branches>bark>stem-wood>roots.For whole tree,E. grandis and E. pellita had the highest mean GCV and AFCV values respectively,while E.torelliana had the lowest.