中华肾脏病杂志
中華腎髒病雜誌
중화신장병잡지
2009年
5期
341-344
,共4页
石书梅%赵学智%陆烈%卜磊%陈意志
石書梅%趙學智%陸烈%蔔磊%陳意誌
석서매%조학지%륙렬%복뢰%진의지
血液透析滤过%骨病医学%骨密度%降钙素%二膦酸盐
血液透析濾過%骨病醫學%骨密度%降鈣素%二膦痠鹽
혈액투석려과%골병의학%골밀도%강개소%이련산염
Hemodiafiltration%Osteopathic medicine%Bone density%Calcitonin%Bisphosphonates
目的 观察降钙素及二膦酸盐治疗维持性血液透析(MHD)患者肾性骨病的疗效及安全性.方法 43例MHD患者按数字随机法分成A、B两组,均常规服用碳酸钙1.0 gtid、骨化三醇0.25μg qd.A组加用降钙素20 υ,皮下注射,每周3次(常规血液透析时使用);B组在使用降钙素的同时加用二膦酸盐70 mg,13服,每周1次.在治疗前及治疗3、6、12个月时分别检测血全段甲状旁腺激素(PTH)、血钙、血磷、血清碱性磷酸酶(AKP)水平和腰椎、股骨颈骨密度,以及记录骨痛程度(采用视觉模拟疼痛评分,VAS)和不良反应.结果 两组患者AKP和PTH水平比治疗前显著下降,治疗前和12个月时,A组AKP(U/L)为244.05±41.99和148.35±27.71;B组为245.60±40.86和143.40±28.03;A组PTH(ng/L)为697.5±119.7和267.4±45.9;B组为708.2±120.3和277.6±41.9;差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).两组血钙、血磷水平治疗前后差异无统计学意义.两组患者腰椎、股骨颈骨密度在治疗3、6个月时变化不明显,12个月时显著好转.与治疗前比较,12个月时A组腰椎骨密度(g/cm2)为1.202±0.251比1.062±0.223;B组为1.189±0.225比1.033±0.152;A组股骨颈骨密度(g/cm2)为1.067±0.095比0.993±0.108;B组为1.018±0.217比0.947±0.083,均P<0.05.两组治疗前后主观评价骨痛程度减轻,VAS比治疗前显著下降,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).除B组个别患者有轻度消化道反应外,余无不良反应.结论 降钙素及合用二膦酸盐可有效减少MHD患者的骨量丢失,降低PTH水平,改善临床症状,且无明显不良反应.单用降钙素与合用二膦酸盐的疗效无显著差异.
目的 觀察降鈣素及二膦痠鹽治療維持性血液透析(MHD)患者腎性骨病的療效及安全性.方法 43例MHD患者按數字隨機法分成A、B兩組,均常規服用碳痠鈣1.0 gtid、骨化三醇0.25μg qd.A組加用降鈣素20 υ,皮下註射,每週3次(常規血液透析時使用);B組在使用降鈣素的同時加用二膦痠鹽70 mg,13服,每週1次.在治療前及治療3、6、12箇月時分彆檢測血全段甲狀徬腺激素(PTH)、血鈣、血燐、血清堿性燐痠酶(AKP)水平和腰椎、股骨頸骨密度,以及記錄骨痛程度(採用視覺模擬疼痛評分,VAS)和不良反應.結果 兩組患者AKP和PTH水平比治療前顯著下降,治療前和12箇月時,A組AKP(U/L)為244.05±41.99和148.35±27.71;B組為245.60±40.86和143.40±28.03;A組PTH(ng/L)為697.5±119.7和267.4±45.9;B組為708.2±120.3和277.6±41.9;差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.05).兩組血鈣、血燐水平治療前後差異無統計學意義.兩組患者腰椎、股骨頸骨密度在治療3、6箇月時變化不明顯,12箇月時顯著好轉.與治療前比較,12箇月時A組腰椎骨密度(g/cm2)為1.202±0.251比1.062±0.223;B組為1.189±0.225比1.033±0.152;A組股骨頸骨密度(g/cm2)為1.067±0.095比0.993±0.108;B組為1.018±0.217比0.947±0.083,均P<0.05.兩組治療前後主觀評價骨痛程度減輕,VAS比治療前顯著下降,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).除B組箇彆患者有輕度消化道反應外,餘無不良反應.結論 降鈣素及閤用二膦痠鹽可有效減少MHD患者的骨量丟失,降低PTH水平,改善臨床癥狀,且無明顯不良反應.單用降鈣素與閤用二膦痠鹽的療效無顯著差異.
목적 관찰강개소급이련산염치료유지성혈액투석(MHD)환자신성골병적료효급안전성.방법 43례MHD환자안수자수궤법분성A、B량조,균상규복용탄산개1.0 gtid、골화삼순0.25μg qd.A조가용강개소20 υ,피하주사,매주3차(상규혈액투석시사용);B조재사용강개소적동시가용이련산염70 mg,13복,매주1차.재치료전급치료3、6、12개월시분별검측혈전단갑상방선격소(PTH)、혈개、혈린、혈청감성린산매(AKP)수평화요추、고골경골밀도,이급기록골통정도(채용시각모의동통평분,VAS)화불량반응.결과 량조환자AKP화PTH수평비치료전현저하강,치료전화12개월시,A조AKP(U/L)위244.05±41.99화148.35±27.71;B조위245.60±40.86화143.40±28.03;A조PTH(ng/L)위697.5±119.7화267.4±45.9;B조위708.2±120.3화277.6±41.9;차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.05).량조혈개、혈린수평치료전후차이무통계학의의.량조환자요추、고골경골밀도재치료3、6개월시변화불명현,12개월시현저호전.여치료전비교,12개월시A조요추골밀도(g/cm2)위1.202±0.251비1.062±0.223;B조위1.189±0.225비1.033±0.152;A조고골경골밀도(g/cm2)위1.067±0.095비0.993±0.108;B조위1.018±0.217비0.947±0.083,균P<0.05.량조치료전후주관평개골통정도감경,VAS비치료전현저하강,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).제B조개별환자유경도소화도반응외,여무불량반응.결론 강개소급합용이련산염가유효감소MHD환자적골량주실,강저PTH수평,개선림상증상,차무명현불량반응.단용강개소여합용이련산염적료효무현저차이.
Objective To observe the efficacy of ealcitonin and bisphosphonates on renal osteopathy of maintenance hemodialysis (MHD)patients. Methods Forty-three MHD patients were raindomly divided into two groups: A group and B group. All the patients were routinely received oral calcium carbonate 1.0 g tid and calcitriol 0.25 μg qd. Calcitonin (20U) hypodermic injection was given three times a week additionally during hemodialysis in A group. Patients in B group received bisphosphonates 70 mg once a week based on the therapy of A group. Serum levels of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase (AKP), bone mass density (BMD) of lumbar spine and femoral neck, and the degree of bone ache (visual analogue scale, VAS) were assessed before the therapy and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. The adverse reactions were recorded during treatment. Results The levels of AKP and iPTH in both two groups decreased significantly after treatment. The above values of pre-treatment and 12 months after treatment were as follows: AKP(U/L)of A group 244.05±41.99 and 148.35±27.71,of B group 245.60±40.86 and 143.40±28.03;PTH(ng/L) of A group 697.5±119.7 and 267.4±45.9,of B group 708.2±120.3 and 277.6±41.9 (all P<0.05). While the levels of calcium and phosphorus did not change obviously during treatment (P>0.05). BMD was not improved at 3, 6 mouths and became better at 12 mouths after treatment. As compared to pre-treatment, BMD of lumbar spine(g/cm2) in A group was 1.062±0.223 vs 1.202±0.251 ,in B group 1.033±0.152 vs 1.189±0.225; BMD of femoral neck (g/cm2)in A group was 0.993±0.108 vs 1.067±0.095,in B group 0.947±0.083 vs 1.018 ±0.217 (all P<0.05). The scores of VAS also decreased significantly at 3, 6, 12 months after treatment(P<0.05). No severe adverse reaction was found during the treatment. Conclusions Utilization of calcitonin and combination with bisphosphonates during bemodialysis can effectively preserve the BMD and prevent bone loss in MHD patients and is well tolerated. No significant difference of therapeutic effect is observed between using ealcitonin or combination with bisphosphonates.