国际生物制品学杂志
國際生物製品學雜誌
국제생물제품학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICALS
2008年
6期
256-258
,共3页
徐岷田%朱凤才%营亮%吴德林%冯晓晨
徐岷田%硃鳳纔%營亮%吳德林%馮曉晨
서민전%주봉재%영량%오덕림%풍효신
肾综合征出血热%疫苗%免疫原性
腎綜閤徵齣血熱%疫苗%免疫原性
신종합정출혈열%역묘%면역원성
Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome%Vaccine%Immunogenicity
目的 评价双价肾综合征出血热纯化疫苗(Vero细胞)在6~15岁儿童和>60岁老年人中的免疫原性.方法对知情同意的500名6~15岁(儿童组)、16~60岁(成年人组)和>60岁(老年人组)的健康人群按2∶1∶2的人数比例非随机接种双价肾综合征出血热纯化疫苗(Vero细胞),其中以成年人组作为对照.用ELISA和空斑减少中和试验测定儿童和老年人接种疫苗后的抗体阳转率和几何平均滴度(GMT).结果经ELISA测定,试验组(儿童和老年人)免疫后的抗体阳转率与成年人对照组的差异无统计学意义;老年人组与成年人组的抗体GMT差异无统计学意义,儿童组的GMT水平低于成年人组,差异有统计学意义,但GMT达到有效保护水平.经空斑减少中和试验测定,试验组的抗体阳转率和GMT与对照组的差异均无统计学意义.结论疫苗对≥6岁的所有健康人群接种(禁忌证除外)均具有良好的免疫效果.
目的 評價雙價腎綜閤徵齣血熱純化疫苗(Vero細胞)在6~15歲兒童和>60歲老年人中的免疫原性.方法對知情同意的500名6~15歲(兒童組)、16~60歲(成年人組)和>60歲(老年人組)的健康人群按2∶1∶2的人數比例非隨機接種雙價腎綜閤徵齣血熱純化疫苗(Vero細胞),其中以成年人組作為對照.用ELISA和空斑減少中和試驗測定兒童和老年人接種疫苗後的抗體暘轉率和幾何平均滴度(GMT).結果經ELISA測定,試驗組(兒童和老年人)免疫後的抗體暘轉率與成年人對照組的差異無統計學意義;老年人組與成年人組的抗體GMT差異無統計學意義,兒童組的GMT水平低于成年人組,差異有統計學意義,但GMT達到有效保護水平.經空斑減少中和試驗測定,試驗組的抗體暘轉率和GMT與對照組的差異均無統計學意義.結論疫苗對≥6歲的所有健康人群接種(禁忌證除外)均具有良好的免疫效果.
목적 평개쌍개신종합정출혈열순화역묘(Vero세포)재6~15세인동화>60세노년인중적면역원성.방법대지정동의적500명6~15세(인동조)、16~60세(성년인조)화>60세(노년인조)적건강인군안2∶1∶2적인수비례비수궤접충쌍개신종합정출혈열순화역묘(Vero세포),기중이성년인조작위대조.용ELISA화공반감소중화시험측정인동화노년인접충역묘후적항체양전솔화궤하평균적도(GMT).결과경ELISA측정,시험조(인동화노년인)면역후적항체양전솔여성년인대조조적차이무통계학의의;노년인조여성년인조적항체GMT차이무통계학의의,인동조적GMT수평저우성년인조,차이유통계학의의,단GMT체도유효보호수평.경공반감소중화시험측정,시험조적항체양전솔화GMT여대조조적차이균무통계학의의.결론역묘대≥6세적소유건강인군접충(금기증제외)균구유량호적면역효과.
Objective To evaluate the immunogenicity of purified bivalent hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) vaccine (Veto cell) in children (6-15 years) and the elderly (over 60 years). Methods Five hundred healthy people aged 6-15, 16-60, and> 60 were nonrandomly inoculated with tive rate and GMT were determined by ELISA method and plaque reduction neutralization test. Results There were no significant differences of antibody positive rates by ELISA method between the test groups (children and the elderly) and the control. No significant difference of GMT level was found between the elderly group and the control,but the GMT level in children, which was still protective, was significantly lower than that in the control group. There were no significant differences of antibody positive rates and GMT levels by plaque reduction neutralization test between the test groups and the control. Conclusions The purified HFRS vaccine has good immune effect in the healthy people of 6 years and above (with the exception of contraindications).