中华医学科研管理杂志
中華醫學科研管理雜誌
중화의학과연관리잡지
ZHONGHUA YIXUE KEYAN GUANLI ZAZHI CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
2010年
6期
373-375
,共3页
眼外科手术%手术准入%评价指标%德尔菲技术
眼外科手術%手術準入%評價指標%德爾菲技術
안외과수술%수술준입%평개지표%덕이비기술
Ophthalmology%Surgery access%Evaluation%Delphi technique
目的 建立眼科手术准入评价指标体系,为规范眼科手术准人提供依据.方法 采用Delphi法对14名眼科专家进行两轮问卷调查,听取专家的意见和建议,筛选评价指标.结果 专家的平均年龄为42岁,全部具有副高以上职称,平均工作年限为20.8年;两轮咨句问卷回收率为93.33%,专家平均权威系数为0.78;确立了9项眼科手术准入指标体系;两轮咨询后,专家协调系数为0.521,差异具有显著意义(P＜0.01).结论 眼科手术准入评价指标体系可信程度较高,具有从多方面对眼科手术准入实施量化评价、对眼科手术准入的医生要求更高、患者参与对眼科手术准入的评价等特点,可为科学合理评价眼科手术准入提供辅助决策支持.
目的 建立眼科手術準入評價指標體繫,為規範眼科手術準人提供依據.方法 採用Delphi法對14名眼科專傢進行兩輪問捲調查,聽取專傢的意見和建議,篩選評價指標.結果 專傢的平均年齡為42歲,全部具有副高以上職稱,平均工作年限為20.8年;兩輪咨句問捲迴收率為93.33%,專傢平均權威繫數為0.78;確立瞭9項眼科手術準入指標體繫;兩輪咨詢後,專傢協調繫數為0.521,差異具有顯著意義(P＜0.01).結論 眼科手術準入評價指標體繫可信程度較高,具有從多方麵對眼科手術準入實施量化評價、對眼科手術準入的醫生要求更高、患者參與對眼科手術準入的評價等特點,可為科學閤理評價眼科手術準入提供輔助決策支持.
목적 건립안과수술준입평개지표체계,위규범안과수술준인제공의거.방법 채용Delphi법대14명안과전가진행량륜문권조사,은취전가적의견화건의,사선평개지표.결과 전가적평균년령위42세,전부구유부고이상직칭,평균공작년한위20.8년;량륜자구문권회수솔위93.33%,전가평균권위계수위0.78;학립료9항안과수술준입지표체계;량륜자순후,전가협조계수위0.521,차이구유현저의의(P＜0.01).결론 안과수술준입평개지표체계가신정도교고,구유종다방면대안과수술준입실시양화평개、대안과수술준입적의생요구경고、환자삼여대안과수술준입적평개등특점,가위과학합리평개안과수술준입제공보조결책지지.
Objective To establish an evaluation index system for access to ophthalmic surgery so as to standardize the access. Method Collect 14 ophthalmologists' recommendations on access criteria for ophthalmic surgery in two rounds of questionnaire survey by Delphi method. Results The return rate of rounds of consultation questionnaire was 93.33%, and the average expert authority coefficient was 0.78.Nine ophthalmic surgery access indicators were established. The coordination of expert coefficient was 0.521 after two consultation. It had significant difference ( P＜0.01 ). Conclusion The ophthalmic surgery access indicator system is highly credible and allows quantitative assessment of ophthalmic surgery from various aspects. It is more demanding for ophthalmologist, and gets more involvement of patients in the evaluation of ophthalmic surgery access. It could contribute to scientific and rational decision-making on access for ophthalmic surgery.
