中国临床药理学杂志
中國臨床藥理學雜誌
중국림상약이학잡지
THE CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
2010年
4期
267-270
,共4页
梁雁%许俊羽%兰培%赵侠%周颖%崔一民
樑雁%許俊羽%蘭培%趙俠%週穎%崔一民
량안%허준우%란배%조협%주영%최일민
盐酸二甲双胍肠溶胶囊%高效液相色谱法%生物等效性
鹽痠二甲雙胍腸溶膠囊%高效液相色譜法%生物等效性
염산이갑쌍고장용효낭%고효액상색보법%생물등효성
metformin hydrochloride enteric-coated capsules%HPLC%bioequivalence
目的 研究健康受试者单剂量口服2种国产盐酸二甲双胍(降糖药)肠溶胶囊的药代动力学和生物等效性.方法 采用开放、双周期随机交叉给药方案,22名健康男性受试者单剂量口服2种盐酸二甲双胍肠溶胶囊1 000 mg,用HPLC法测定血浆中二甲双胍浓度,计算其主要药代动力学参数.结果 单剂量口服盐酸二甲双胍肠溶胶囊受试制剂和参比制剂的主要药代动力学参数:AUC_(0-tn) 分别为(9.08±3.59)和(9.09±3.28)μg·h·mL~(-1);AUC_(0-∞)分别为(9.72±3.67)和(9.88±3.62)μg·h·mL~(-1);C_(max)分别为(1.76±0.69)和(1.80±0.63)μg·mL~(-1);t_(max)分别为(3.70±1.08)和(3.77±0.81)h;t_(1/2)分别为(3.03±0.49)和(3.08±0.52)h;F为(103.6±36.9)%.结论 2种制剂具有生物等效性.
目的 研究健康受試者單劑量口服2種國產鹽痠二甲雙胍(降糖藥)腸溶膠囊的藥代動力學和生物等效性.方法 採用開放、雙週期隨機交扠給藥方案,22名健康男性受試者單劑量口服2種鹽痠二甲雙胍腸溶膠囊1 000 mg,用HPLC法測定血漿中二甲雙胍濃度,計算其主要藥代動力學參數.結果 單劑量口服鹽痠二甲雙胍腸溶膠囊受試製劑和參比製劑的主要藥代動力學參數:AUC_(0-tn) 分彆為(9.08±3.59)和(9.09±3.28)μg·h·mL~(-1);AUC_(0-∞)分彆為(9.72±3.67)和(9.88±3.62)μg·h·mL~(-1);C_(max)分彆為(1.76±0.69)和(1.80±0.63)μg·mL~(-1);t_(max)分彆為(3.70±1.08)和(3.77±0.81)h;t_(1/2)分彆為(3.03±0.49)和(3.08±0.52)h;F為(103.6±36.9)%.結論 2種製劑具有生物等效性.
목적 연구건강수시자단제량구복2충국산염산이갑쌍고(강당약)장용효낭적약대동역학화생물등효성.방법 채용개방、쌍주기수궤교차급약방안,22명건강남성수시자단제량구복2충염산이갑쌍고장용효낭1 000 mg,용HPLC법측정혈장중이갑쌍고농도,계산기주요약대동역학삼수.결과 단제량구복염산이갑쌍고장용효낭수시제제화삼비제제적주요약대동역학삼수:AUC_(0-tn) 분별위(9.08±3.59)화(9.09±3.28)μg·h·mL~(-1);AUC_(0-∞)분별위(9.72±3.67)화(9.88±3.62)μg·h·mL~(-1);C_(max)분별위(1.76±0.69)화(1.80±0.63)μg·mL~(-1);t_(max)분별위(3.70±1.08)화(3.77±0.81)h;t_(1/2)분별위(3.03±0.49)화(3.08±0.52)h;F위(103.6±36.9)%.결론 2충제제구유생물등효성.
Objective To study the bioequivalence of two domestic praperations of metformin hydrochloride enteric-coated capsules in Chinese healthy volunteers.Methods A single administration of 1 000 mg metformin hydrochloride enteric-coated capsules of test and reference formulation was given to 22 healthy male volunteers according to an open,randomized,cross-over study.The concentrations of metformin were determined by HPLC method.Results The main pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference formulation were as follows AUC_(0-tn) were (9.08±3.59)and(9.09±3.28)μg·h·mL~(-1);AUC_(0-∞) were(9.72±3.67)and(9.88±3.62)μg·h·mL~(-1);C_(max) were(1.76±0.69)and(1.80±0.63)μg·mL~(-1);t_(max) were(3.70±1.08)and(3.77±0.81)h;t_(1/2) were(3.03±0.49)and(3.08±0.52)h for test and reference formulation,respectively.The relative bioavailability was(103.6±36.9)%.Conclusion The results of statistical analysis showed that the two formulations were bioequivalence.