CAJ | 학술논문

叙述者在叙事时总要表现出对人物和事件的态度，任何叙述文本都避免不了叙述者的评论干预。现代文学作品对于评论干预的要求越来越高，评论干预的研究也因此更加不容忽视。文章在综述国内外该领域研究现状的基础上，试图指出评论干预研究的问题和不足所在。首先，学界对于评论、干预以及评论干预三者之间关系缺乏明确界定。其次，评论干预研究多集中在显性评论干预，对于隐性评论干预关注不够。再者，研究多聚焦具体作品的评论干预分析探讨，鲜见评论干预的系统理论探究。最后，评论干预在叙事进程中发挥的作用未给予充分重视。
서술자재서사시총요표현출대인물화사건적태도，임하서술문본도피면불료서술자적평론간예。현대문학작품대우평론간예적요구월래월고，평론간예적연구야인차경가불용홀시。문장재종술국내외해영역연구현상적기출상，시도지출평론간예연구적문제화불족소재。수선，학계대우평론、간예이급평론간예삼자지간관계결핍명학계정。기차，평론간예연구다집중재현성평론간예，대우은성평론간예관주불구。재자，연구다취초구체작품적평론간예분석탐토，선견평론간예적계통이론탐구。최후，평론간예재서사진정중발휘적작용미급여충분중시。
Commentary cannot be avoided by a narrator in any narrative for narrating is always accompanied by the expression of narrators’attitude towards characters or events in the story. The increasingly high demand for its real-ization in modern literary narrative makes commentary deserve more research and investigation. This paper re-views its history and attempts to present features and inadequacies of current studies on commentary. Firstly, the relationship between commentary and intervention has not been illustrated explicitly. Secondly, explicit commen-tary has been examined much more than implicit commentary. Thirdly, the analysis of commentary in specific texts is preferred while the establishment of commentary as a system is ignored. Fourthly, what commentary can func-tion in narrative progression has not been fully examined.