CAJ | 학술논문

阅卷权是辩护权的组成部分，以获取充分的资讯为目的而设置的阅卷权是被追诉人实现辩护权实质有效的保障。纵观世界立法，对阅卷权的规定有被追诉人与辩护人不同时享有阅卷权、被追诉人与辩护人享有同等的阅卷权、被追诉人与辩护人的阅卷权区分对待几种情形。理论和实务上之所以对被追诉人本人是否享有阅卷权存在争议，主要出于保护原始卷宗的完整性、避免使案情晦暗、维护第三人的利益等方面的考量，但是这些考量不能成为禁止被追诉人阅卷的理由。诉讼主体理论、程序正义理论、公正审判权和有效辩护理论等都要求赋予被追诉人阅卷权，且出于对保护被追诉人对案件的知悉、增强事实认定的准确性、提高诉讼效率等现实必要性方面的考量，也应当赋予被追诉人阅卷权。
열권권시변호권적조성부분，이획취충분적자신위목적이설치적열권권시피추소인실현변호권실질유효적보장。종관세계입법，대열권권적규정유피추소인여변호인불동시향유열권권、피추소인여변호인향유동등적열권권、피추소인여변호인적열권권구분대대궤충정형。이론화실무상지소이대피추소인본인시부향유열권권존재쟁의，주요출우보호원시권종적완정성、피면사안정회암、유호제삼인적이익등방면적고량，단시저사고량불능성위금지피추소인열권적이유。소송주체이론、정서정의이론、공정심판권화유효변호이론등도요구부여피추소인열권권，차출우대보호피추소인대안건적지실、증강사실인정적준학성、제고소송효솔등현실필요성방면적고량，야응당부여피추소인열권권。
The right of reading original files is part of the defense rights,it is set for the accused to get sufficient information in order to help the implementation of the right of defense.Throughout the legis-lation in the world,the set of reading original files right has several cases,such as,defendant and de-fender shouldn’t enj oy the right of reading original files at the same time,defendant and defender should enjoy the equal right of reading original files,right of reading original files should be differentiated be-tween defendant and defender.The dispute about defendant's reading original file right lies on the pro-tection of the integrity of the original file,avoiding the case to be ambiguous,and safeguarding the in-terests of the third party,but these are not the reasons to prevent the accused from reading original files.The theory of the subj ect of litigation,theory of procedural j ustice,j ust j urisdiction are all re-quired to give the accused the right of reading original files.On the other hand,in order to protect the accused’s awareness of the case,enhance the accuracy of fact-finding,and improve the efficiency of law-suit,the accused should be given the right of reading original files.