国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2012年
6期
784-786
,共3页
周铸民%束煌%彭兆伟%宋宁%王骥
週鑄民%束煌%彭兆偉%宋寧%王驥
주주민%속황%팽조위%송저%왕기
无机三氧化物聚合体%Vitapex糊剂%氢氧化钙糊剂%根尖诱导形成术%年轻恒牙
無機三氧化物聚閤體%Vitapex糊劑%氫氧化鈣糊劑%根尖誘導形成術%年輕恆牙
무궤삼양화물취합체%Vitapex호제%경양화개호제%근첨유도형성술%년경항아
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)%Vitapex paste%Calcium hydroxide paste%Apexification%Younger permanent teeth
目的 观察无机三氧化物聚合体(MTA)糊剂、Vitapex糊剂和氢氧化钙(CH)糊剂三种不同根充材料对年轻恒牙根尖诱导形成术的临床疗效.方法 将224患者共计257颗牙根未完全发育完成的年轻恒牙分为A组(71颗)、B组(68颗)和C组(65颗),分别用MTA糊剂、Vitapex糊剂和CH糊剂进行根尖诱导成形术,术后随访3年并比较临床疗效.结果 MTA组有效65颗,有效率91.55%; Vitapex组有效61颗,有效率89.70%; CH组有效50颗,有效率76.92%.Vitapex 组与CH组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),MTA组与CH组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但MTA组与Vitapex组之间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 与CH糊剂比较,MTA糊剂和Vitapex糊剂为更理想的临床根尖诱导材料.
目的 觀察無機三氧化物聚閤體(MTA)糊劑、Vitapex糊劑和氫氧化鈣(CH)糊劑三種不同根充材料對年輕恆牙根尖誘導形成術的臨床療效.方法 將224患者共計257顆牙根未完全髮育完成的年輕恆牙分為A組(71顆)、B組(68顆)和C組(65顆),分彆用MTA糊劑、Vitapex糊劑和CH糊劑進行根尖誘導成形術,術後隨訪3年併比較臨床療效.結果 MTA組有效65顆,有效率91.55%; Vitapex組有效61顆,有效率89.70%; CH組有效50顆,有效率76.92%.Vitapex 組與CH組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),MTA組與CH組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),但MTA組與Vitapex組之間比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 與CH糊劑比較,MTA糊劑和Vitapex糊劑為更理想的臨床根尖誘導材料.
목적 관찰무궤삼양화물취합체(MTA)호제、Vitapex호제화경양화개(CH)호제삼충불동근충재료대년경항아근첨유도형성술적림상료효.방법 장224환자공계257과아근미완전발육완성적년경항아분위A조(71과)、B조(68과)화C조(65과),분별용MTA호제、Vitapex호제화CH호제진행근첨유도성형술,술후수방3년병비교림상료효.결과 MTA조유효65과,유효솔91.55%; Vitapex조유효61과,유효솔89.70%; CH조유효50과,유효솔76.92%.Vitapex 조여CH조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),MTA조여CH조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),단MTA조여Vitapex조지간비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 여CH호제비교,MTA호제화Vitapex호제위경이상적림상근첨유도재료.
Objective To study the effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA),Vitapex paste and calcium hydroxide(CH) paste in apexification for young permanent teeth.Methods 257 younger permanent teeth with underdeveloped apex and necrotic pulp from 224 cases were randomly selected.The average age was (9.3 ± 1.5) years old.The teeth were randomly assigned to three groups,71 teeth in group A, 68 teeth in group B and 65 teeth in group C.After root canals were prepared and sterilized, the apexification was assigned with MTA paste used in group A,Vitapex paste used in group B and CH paste used in group C.All the teeth were observed for three years.Results In group A,65 teeth were effective and the effective rate was 91.55%.In group B,61 teeth were effective and the effective rate was 89.70%.In group C,50 teeth were effective and the effective rate was 76.92%.There Was significant difference between Vitapex paste and CH paste (P< 0.05).And there was significant difference between MTA paste and CH paste (P < 0.05).There was no significant difference in MTA paste and Vitapex paste (P > 0.05).Conclusion MTA paste and Vitapex paste were more ideal materials than HA paste for apexification in young permanent teeth.