中国临床实用医学
中國臨床實用醫學
중국림상실용의학
CHINA CLINICAL PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2010年
4期
105-107
,共3页
针刺%α1-受体阻滞剂%老年%急性尿潴留
針刺%α1-受體阻滯劑%老年%急性尿潴留
침자%α1-수체조체제%노년%급성뇨저류
Acupuncture%al-receptor blocker%Elderly%Acute retention of urine
目的 探讨针刺联合α1-受体阻滞剂治疗老年急性尿潴留的疗效.方法 采用前瞻性监测和回顾性调查方法,选择2006年1月1日至2009年1月1日发生急性尿潴留的老年住院患者82例,按时间先后顺序分为治疗组39例,对照组43例;两组均经尿道导尿,停留导尿管.对照组口服α1-受体阻滞剂高特灵(盐酸特拉唑嗪)及应用抗生素,治疗组在上述基础上加针刺治疗.结果 治疗组有效率94.87%,对照组有效率为76.74%,两组比较,P<0.05,差异有显著性.结论 针刺联合α1-受体阻滞剂治疗老年急性尿潴留比单纯α1-受体阻滞剂疗效好,有协同作用,缩短了留置尿管时间,避免反复导尿和减少泌尿系统医院感染,值得临床推广.
目的 探討針刺聯閤α1-受體阻滯劑治療老年急性尿潴留的療效.方法 採用前瞻性鑑測和迴顧性調查方法,選擇2006年1月1日至2009年1月1日髮生急性尿潴留的老年住院患者82例,按時間先後順序分為治療組39例,對照組43例;兩組均經尿道導尿,停留導尿管.對照組口服α1-受體阻滯劑高特靈(鹽痠特拉唑嗪)及應用抗生素,治療組在上述基礎上加針刺治療.結果 治療組有效率94.87%,對照組有效率為76.74%,兩組比較,P<0.05,差異有顯著性.結論 針刺聯閤α1-受體阻滯劑治療老年急性尿潴留比單純α1-受體阻滯劑療效好,有協同作用,縮短瞭留置尿管時間,避免反複導尿和減少泌尿繫統醫院感染,值得臨床推廣.
목적 탐토침자연합α1-수체조체제치료노년급성뇨저류적료효.방법 채용전첨성감측화회고성조사방법,선택2006년1월1일지2009년1월1일발생급성뇨저류적노년주원환자82례,안시간선후순서분위치료조39례,대조조43례;량조균경뇨도도뇨,정류도뇨관.대조조구복α1-수체조체제고특령(염산특랍서진)급응용항생소,치료조재상술기출상가침자치료.결과 치료조유효솔94.87%,대조조유효솔위76.74%,량조비교,P<0.05,차이유현저성.결론 침자연합α1-수체조체제치료노년급성뇨저류비단순α1-수체조체제료효호,유협동작용,축단료류치뇨관시간,피면반복도뇨화감소비뇨계통의원감염,치득림상추엄.
Objective To explore acupuncture and al-receptor blocker treatment efficacy of elderly patients with acute urinary retention. Methods Use of forward-looking monitoring and retrospective survey methodology, Choose January 1,2006 to January 1,2009 of acute urinary retention in 82 cases of elderly inpatients,Chronological order according to treatment group,39 cases were divided into control group,43 cases; Transurethral catheterization in both groups, stay catheter. The control group was treated with α1-receptor blocker hytrin (terazosin) and the application of antibiotics; the treatment group based on the above plus acupuncture therapy. Results The treatment group was 94.87% in the control group response rate was 76.74%, the two groups,P<0.05, the difference was significant. Conclusion al-receptor blockers combined with acupuncture treatment of elderly patients with acute urinary retention al-receptor blocker than simply good effects, synergistic effect, shortening the indwelling catheter time, avoid repeated urinary catheterization and reduce hospital infection, worthy to be popularized.